Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Feminism and Militarization

Militarization describes the sociopolitical environment through which militaristic control, influence, and ideologies are spread throughout society. Militarization marks a society's dependence on the military for its well-being and results in the normalization of militaristic values. Feminist work on militarization, pioneered by Cynthia Enloe, has emphasized the importance of looking for the causes of militarism (the state of military control) that occur through militarization, moving beyond traditional studies that have focused purely on the consequences of militarism. Feminists are particularly concerned with the ways in which masculinity and femininity are mapped out and used throughout a variety of military interactions. Feminists ask why militarized masculinity has been privileged, but focus primarily on the ways that militarization affects women's lives. Although feminist scholars of militarization are careful to differentiate among different cultural contexts, they identify common patterns of gendered behavior in militaries throughout the world. These theorists have also argued that feminists must move beyond a simple focus on war and examine the processes of gender socialization for military roles, such as the societal valorization of the male soldier. This entry discusses militarized masculinity, women warriors, and prostitution, rape, and care work connected with the military.

Militarized Masculinity

Feminist theorists have demonstrated that the military relies on and promotes violent masculinity. Military commanders have also used men's pride in their roles as fathers, sons, and heterosexuals to motivate them to obey commands, frequently through humiliation. The tenuousness of masculinity has particular consequences within the military, where superior officers and peers alike challenge men's manhood if they are unable to perform a required task or show signs of weakness. This perceived loss of masculinity renders a man “unfit” for military service, and violent masculinity is both legitimized and rewarded by the military. Feminists argue that male soldiers are required to prove their masculinity by committing violent acts, frequently against women. These constructions of masculinity, though, depend on an opposing construction of passive femininity, which is troubled by the presence of female soldiers.

Women Warriors

Women have been informally engaged in combat in every American war. However, this fighting was covert for much of the country's history because women in the United States were not allowed to join the military until World War II. Although women's involvement has increased and shifted dramatically since then, women are still generally excluded from ground combat. Feminist theorists argue that this exclusion reifies ideals of feminine weakness and encourages the notion that male soldiers should take care of their female comrades. Gender ideologies also promote sexist behavior and sexual harassment. The 1991 Tailhook scandal was one of the most infamous incidents of this kind within U.S. military history, when 83 women and 7 men were sexually assaulted, several of whom were female soldiers. One reason given for the Naval officers' behavior was resentment toward women's presence in the military, which had prompted a series of attempts at reforming military traditions. Feminists have also suggested that the paternalism that surrounds female soldiers situates them as second-class citizens and makes them more vulnerable to sexual assault and harassment.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading