Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

For federally recognized American Indian tribes in the United States, of which there are 334 in the lower forty-eight states, sovereignty is the central political issue. This issue is expressed through the treaty relationship that has existed between American Indian nations and the federal government since 1776. In addition to the federally recognized tribes, there are 228 Alaska Native Villages, which are also federally recognized but through the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act of 1971. As distinct from the tribes in the lower forty-eight states, whose land is held in “trust” by the federal government, the Alaska Native villages are organized into corporations that hold their land. Although the land held in trust, most of which is organized into reservations, is legally defined as “Indian country,” the Alaska Native land is not so defined.

Native Hawaiians do not currently have a special relationship with the federal government, though there is currently a movement on the island and in Congress to have Native communities recognized under the same rubric of federal American Indian law as the tribes in the lower forty-eight states. However, this movement is opposed by groups of Native Hawaiians who reason that gaining “trust” status would only limit or co-opt historic Hawaiian sovereignty, which pre-dates the European invasion of the islands in the 18th century.

In fact, the sovereignty of all Indigenous Peoples worldwide, as expressed in the UN Draft Declaration of the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, pre-dates the European invasions beginning in 1492. But the declaration also recognizes, as it condemns, the limitations placed on this sovereignty by the various European colonizers. Recognizing that it is the aspiration of Indigenous Peoples worldwide to restore in one way or another their precolonial sovereignty, this entry focuses on how the colonial power of the United States has limited and continues to limit this sovereignty for the 334 American Indian tribes in what would become the lower forty-eight states.

Congress and Sovereignty

Tribal sovereignty is inherent and recognized as such under federal American Indian law, the colonial body of statute, and case law that regulates relations between the tribes and the federal government. Under this law, the Supreme Court has recognized Congress as having “plenary power” in American Indian affairs. Although there is an ongoing debate about the source of this virtually absolute power, the Court has historically located it in Article I, Section VIII, Paragraph 3 and Article II, Section II, Paragraph 2 of the U.S. Constitution. The former is the Commerce Clause under which the Congress has the power “To regulate commerce with foreign nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian tribes”; the latter gives the president “power, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, to make treaties, provided two-thirds of the Senators present concur.”

Until 1871, when Congress abrogated treaty-making with American Indian tribes, the federal government negotiated treaties with Native tribes and in that sense recognized them as independent, sovereign nations. But from the beginning of the Republic, Congress and the Supreme Court, deferring to what was interpreted as the preeminent power of Congress in American Indian affairs as it does to this day, began to limit Native sovereignty.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading