Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Racial Formation

In the United States, race and racial categories have long been at the focus of numerous social, academic, and political debates. Historically, race was studied through the paradigm of biology; physiological differences (color, hair, and bone) were the basis for racial categorization. This biological grounding of racial difference gave way to three new conceptualizations of racial difference in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, one based on the concept of ethnicity, the second on class, and the third on the concept of nation.

During the 1970s and 1980s, issues of class, country, and multiculturalism became highly contested terrains. In response to these socio-politico-economic trends, Michael Omi and Howard Winant's Racial Formation in the United States: From the 1960s to the 1990s argued that all of these trends reduced race to ethnicity, class, or nation. These reductionstic models became proxies for race, but race as an analytically distinct category was ignored, according to Omi and Winant.

Against these dominant models, Omi and Winant put forth their theory of racial formation: that race was not a by-product of some other category but, rather, a sociohistorical process, both structural and representative, by which racial categories are formed, inhabited, transformed, and destroyed. By recognizing the racial dimension to social structures (macrolevel) and the meanings that racial groups (microlevel) take on within those structures, Omi and Winant offer a theory of race as a point of struggle and contestation analytically distinct and irreducible to ethnicity, class, and nation. The authors consider race as a social construct, unstable and constantly transforming because of historical pressure and political struggle. Understanding true dynamics and ramification of race is particularly important in the United States where the concept has varied greatly over time without ever leaving the center stage. This entry looks at previous theories of race and discusses the creation of racial formation theory.

Critique of Prevailing Theories

Omi and Winant review and analyze three perspectives on race relations within the United States: ethnicity theory, class-based theory, and nation-based theory. They argue that all three of these theoretical approaches depend on one another to capture the nuances of racial dynamics and fail to emphasize the autonomous nature of race within social, political, and cultural spheres.

Ethnicity Theory

Starting out as a means to destabilize the prevalent biologically based racial arguments made at the beginning of the 20th century, the theory of ethnicity suggested that race was a social category. Ethnicity was determined by an individual's culture and heritage and was used to categorize people into various ethnic groups. Beginning as a challenge to the status quo of racial theory, ethnicity theory came to represent the commonsense perspective on race within the U.S. cultural and social context.

By the 1960s and 1970s, ethnicity theory symbolized the conservative model that measured all ethnic groups in relation to White ethnic groups, that is, Irish, Germans, Jews, and Poles. Omi and Winant argue that this conflation neglects the significance of race in shaping ethnic minorities' experiences of racist institutions and social structures. When a given minority fails to climb the social mobility ladder, Omi and Winant said, people look to the values of the ethnic minority group for an explanation rather than giving more scrutiny to the unequal and racist organizing institutional structures: government, education system, and the labor force.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading