Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Race, UNESCO Statements on

Four statements of expert opinion about race were sponsored and published by the UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) between 1950 and 1967. Widely distributed, they were regarded as authoritative rebuttals of outdated theories. The four statements bore on one of UNESCO's central concerns, because its constitution, dating from 1945, had declared, “The great and terrible war which now has ended was made possible by the denial of the democratic principles of the dignity, equality and mutual respect of men, and by the propagation, in their place, through ignorance and prejudice, of the doctrine of the inequality of men and races.” This entry summarizes the UNESCO statements.

Scientific Facts

The UN's Economic and Social Council asked UNESCO in 1951 to develop effective educational programs in the fields of prevention of discrimination and protection of minorities and to undertake “a programme of disseminating scientific facts designed to remove what is commonly known as racial prejudice.” UNESCO had already started work on this by assembling an international committee of experts, representing both the biological and the social sciences. The committee had prepared a fifteen-paragraph “Statement on Race” that was published in 1950. Among other things, it stated, “A race, from the biological standpoint, may therefore be defined as one of the group of populations constituting the species Homo sapiens.” It went on to explain, “When most people use the term ‘race’ they do not do so in the sense above defined” so that “the biological fact of race and the myth of ‘race’ should be distinguished” and that “it would be better when speaking of human races to drop the term ‘race’ altogether and speak of ethnic groups.”

According to present knowledge there is no proof that the groups of mankind differ in their innate mental characteristics … biological studies lend support to the ethic of universal brotherhood; for man is born with drives towards co-operation, and unless those drives are satisfied, men and nations alike fall ill.

The statement was primarily concerned with the use of race in the sense of species, but in referring to “the biological fact of race,” it touched on the use of the word to signify inheritance.

Because of last-minute withdrawals, biological science was not adequately represented in the committee. Many biologists, though not rejecting the statement's general spirit or its main conclusions, believed that it went beyond the scientific facts (e.g., in the reference to “drives towards co-operation”) and that it confused the biological and social uses of the word race. To clear up any possible misunderstanding, UNESCO assembled another group, this time including physical anthropologists and geneticists who had expressed disagreement with the first statement. This group drew up the 1951 Statement on the Nature of Race and Race Differences. UNESCO considered it important to avoid any suggestion that it was issuing an authoritative manifesto as the last word on the race question, so it sent out the draft to a further ninety-six scientists. In a booklet titled The Race Concept, UNESCO then published the statement, a selection of observations and comments, three alternative suggested statements, and a reformulation of the 1951 statement prepared by L. C. Dunn of Columbia University, the rapporteur of the 1951 meeting.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading