Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Marxists argue that it is impossible to discuss racism without also considering the economic context in which that racism exists. In the United States, that means capitalism and its accompanying class exploitation. Racial oppression, it is argued, has always been an integral part of U.S. economic and political history. That being said, there are at least two general approaches taken by Marxists who study racism. The first, traditional Marxism, sees class as the fundamental or primary source of oppression, with racism being an important but secondary issue. The second approach, race-sensitive Marxism, argues that both race and class are primary sources of oppression. What follows is an outline of the major points within each of the two approaches.

Traditional Marxism

Traditional Marxists argue that the class oppression that is part of capitalism affects both White workers and workers of color. While all workers are exploited by capitalists, they argue, workers of color are “super-exploited.” In other words, while capitalists make profits from the labor of White workers, they make larger profits from workers of color due to race-segregated labor markets and unequal pay for the same work. The degree of exploitation of workers of color and White workers is viewed as a difference in degree rather than a difference in kind.

In this view, people of color are also seen as part of the “reserve labor force” that is necessary to the smooth functioning of capitalism. In periods of economic expansion when more workers are needed (i.e., World War II), people of color are pulled into jobs they can't usually obtain. During periods of contraction, they are pushed out of these jobs.

It is in the interests of the working class to become class conscious, say traditional Marxists. This means that workers of all races and cultures will understand that their common class interests (exploitation by capitalists) are more important than any differences they may have in terms of race, ethnicity, religion, or culture. It is in the interests of the capitalists, on the other hand, to keep the working class divided.

Racism is one of the ways that the working class remains divided. The ideological and attitudinal aspect of racism (stereotypes, prejudice, political beliefs) make workers believe that workers of other races, rather than capitalists, are their enemies. Whites and people of color will fight each other rather than uniting against the capitalists. This is sometimes called “false consciousness.” Sometimes, capitalists purposely try to use race to divide workers, such as by using Blacks as strikebreakers in a predominantly White workplace. Most of the time, however, the free-floating culture of racism causes workers to think in racial rather than class terms. Traditional Marxists tend to be suspicious of Nationalist movements among people of color (e.g., Black Power during the 1960s and 1970s), since this could further divide the working class.

In analyzing social phenomena like racism, traditional Marxists always ask the question “Who wins and who loses?” White capitalists clearly benefit from racism, and workers of color clearly lose out.

As for White workers, Marxists say that they lose more than they gain from racism. Although they have short-term benefits (e.g., better housing, jobs, pay, education), they are ultimately hurt by their continual exploitation by the capitalists. They would be better off uniting with workers of color against the capitalists.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading