Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Any historical account of the United States must note the violence associated with race relations. An important part of understanding this history lies with examining lynching and its violent impact on U.S. society and discourse. Recently, the definition of lynching, the historical accounts of its victims, and the reasons and motivations for lynching have been examined closely to shed more light on this disturbing component of U.S. history. The late-18th-century definition of lynching as nonlethal flogging, tarring and feathering, and running people out of town began with Colonel Charles Lynch, a justice of the peace in Virginia and creator of an informal court system of “lynch mobs” to deal with Tories and suspected horse thieves in the county. During the following century, lynch mobs were formed as an expression of Whites' fears of Black uprisings or slave insurrections, increasingly with lethal consequences. The definition later changed to the extralegal murder of individuals and groups of people by a mob of two or more persons.

Lynching Documented

In 1882, Tuskegee University began keeping records of lynchings in the United States. Tuskegee's first director of records, sociologist Monroe Work, and subsequent generations of Tuskegee librarians and students maintained newspaper and magazine reports of lynchings. This record, published annually from 1882 to 1962, became an important contributor to public attention to this phenomenon. From 1882 to 1885, the number of Whites lynched outnumbered the number of Blacks lynched. After the year 1886, the number of Blacks lynched always exceeded the number of Whites lynched. Through 1944, Tuskegee recorded 3,417 lynchings of Blacks, meaning that, on average, a Black person was murdered by a White mob nearly once a week, every week, during this time period. Although lynchings declined after 1944, it was not until 1952 that a year passed without a single recorded lynching. It is important to note that these records indicate only the number of documented lynchings and that many lynchings occurred without public record.

Reconstruction and Mob Violence

In the Reconstruction era South, lynching of Blacks was used, especially by the Ku Klux Klan, in an effort to reverse the social changes brought on by federal occupation. With the development of the Black Codes, and later the Jim Crow laws, a rise in African American lynchings in the South occurred. Lynching was a means to intimidate, degrade, and control Black people and to soothe the tensions of Whites throughout the southern and border states from Reconstruction to the mid-20th century.

Lynching was an illegal act because it denied a suspect due process under the law. Thus, the information that due process generated (including lawyers' arguments, sworn testimony, and evidence) was not available to assist in understanding the instigating deed and in weighing guilt or innocence. In many cases, if a person was charged with a particular crime, the details of the actual incident would become obscured or falsified. If an individual was being detained by criminal justice authorities, an incensed vigilante mob would form and demand that law officials release the prisoner to the crowd. The law officials either easily acquiesced or surrendered the prisoner through force. Once the mob had obtained the prisoner, a crowd would gather—sometimes up to several thousand people—and the act of the lynching would occur. Many scholars note that lynchings were highly ritualized spectacles.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading