Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

During the past decade, nationally representative surveys of the general public reveal that the majority of U.S. residents endorse principles of equal access to housing, believing that people should be able to live where they want, based on what they can afford, regardless of their race/ethnicity. Indeed, the Fair Housing Act of 1968 prohibits discrimination in the U.S. housing rental and sales markets based on one's race or color, religion, sex, national origin, familial status, or disability. Unfortunately, past and recent housing audits, which are experimental tests of housing discrimination, reveal that discrimination and lack of equal access to all sales and rental markets persist as a reality in U.S. society, especially for minorities. This is important because many race scholars argue that housing discrimination plays a pivotal role in the maintenance and perpetuation of residential segregation in U.S. society.

Historically, housing audits have been used by fair housing groups as a systematic experimental method of testing for and uncovering discrimination in rental and sales markets based on sex, familial status, and race/ethnicity and national origin. During the past 30 years or so, the U.S. federal government has also used large-scale national housing audits to detect levels of racial/ethnic discrimination and to analyze trends across time. To provide a comprehensive overview of housing audits, this entry explains the housing audit methodology, summarizes findings from major national housing audits in the United States, and discusses limitations of the housing audit methodology. Fair housing groups, scholars, and government agencies rely most heavily on the housing audit methodology to uncover racial/ethnic discrimination; thus, that is the explicit focus of this entry.

Methods and History

Racial housing audits are experimental in design, characterized by the quantitative comparison of matched testers' (or auditors') experiences in the housing market. Most often, multiple teams of two racially distinct, but similarly situated, individuals (one minority and one White) are sent into the housing market in an attempt to acquire housing from a random sample of ads placed online and in newspapers. The testers, aside from their racial/ethnic status, are assigned similar identities and characteristics (e.g., same credit score, same income, same education). Testers complete detailed questionnaires following their experiences, and the data are then compiled and analyzed to determine whether minority and White testers were treated differently. Hence, with efforts to control for social and human capital characteristics, such tests have served as an effective way to uncover discrimination. Beginning in 1977, the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) launched the Housing Market Practices Survey (HMPS), which conducted 3,264 tests in forty metropolitan areas. The study provided evidence of significant discrimination against Blacks in sales and rental markets. The results of the HMPS played a role in the passage of the 1988 amendment to the Fair Housing Act and demonstrated the need for a second national study, The Housing Discrimination Study, which was launched in 1989 and covered twenty-five metropolitan areas. A comparison of the two nationwide studies demonstrated that discrimination had not decreased between 1977 and 1989.

In 2000, HUD launched a third national housing audit, with initial analyses revealing that African Americans and Hispanics continue to face significant discriminatory barriers when searching for a home to rent or buy. However, rates of overall discrimination may have decreased somewhat between 1989 and 2000, with the exception of “racial steering”—a realtor suggesting more or less desirable alternatives based on the race of the client—of African Americans and limitations in the financing opportunities and access to rental units for Hispanics. Some scholars argue that declines in housing discrimination revealed in the 2000 HUD audit may be the result of a shift in the prevailing forms of housing discrimination used by landlords, realtors, and others in the housing market. In other words, actors in U.S. housing markets may have become more privy to the illegal forms and consequences of exclusion according to fair housing laws and, thus, have turned to more covert and subtle forms of discrimination not revealed through the audit methodology.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading