Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

The U.S. Supreme Court decision in Hernandez v. Texas in 1954 grew from the most pedestrian roots—a drunken barroom brawl and a club-footed murder suspect. At the time, the courts were so hostile that Mexicans were not called for juries, and rural towns in Texas were often so inhospitable that the lawyers trying a murder case could not safely find housing in the county seat. The state of Texas had fewer than two dozen Mexican American lawyers in active practice when the crime was committed and had no true legal services network to assist in trying such complex cases. Into this milieu came four lawyers determined to test the idea that Mexican American defendants tried on criminal charges should be entitled to a “jury of their peers,” including other Mexican Americans. This entry describes the case, the Supreme Court decision, and its impact.

The Murder Trial

On August 4, 1951, 24-year-old service station attendant Pedro (Pete) Hernandez shot and killed tenant farmer Joe Espinosa during a fight at Chinco Sanchez's Tavern, Sprung's Grocery, Edna, Jackson County, Texas. Within 24 hours, Hernandez was indicted by an all-White grand jury and petit jury panel for murder. On August 8, he was denied bail. During this period of time, John Herrera and James deAnda of Houston were retained as counsel for Hernandez, although Jackson County was well over an hour's trip by highway from their offices. In September, San Antonio attorneys Gustavo Garcia and Carlos Cadena joined the defense team.

On October 4, 1951, the district court refused to quash the Hernandez indictment, not unexpectedly, and deAnda sent his research materials on jury composition to Cadena, who drafted the brief, edited for Jackson County demographics. Between October 8 and 11, Hernandez was tried by an all-White jury, and at the end of the trial he was convicted of murder. On October 11, he was sentenced to life imprisonment. On June 18, 1952, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed the judgment, and on October 22, that court refused a rehearing on the jury selection issue.

A variety of factors came together and persuaded the attorneys that they should take the case to the next level, the U.S. Supreme Court, although no Mexican American lawyer had ever pleaded a case before the Supreme Court. They had taken notice of the bathroom signage in the Jackson County Courthouse—the bathroom door read, “Colored Men” and “Hombres Aqui”—and knew that the government attorneys had noticed, and they vowed to include those facts at trial and in their briefs.

Supreme Court Appeal

By the end of the year 1952, the attorneys had made the collective decision to appeal the case beyond the state, and their patience and preparation were rewarded when on October 12, 1953, certiorari was granted for the case to be heard. At approximately the same time, the Supreme Court also granted cert on the well-known school desegregation cases, which had been consolidated and styled Brown v. Board of Education and which were being reargued after the death of Chief Justice Fred Vinson. Attention was focused on that set of cases, which had been carefully selected and prepared for the final assault on segregation.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading