Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Latina feminism was born out of a civil rights initiative that addressed structural inequalities and is a modified Latino version of the women's liberation movement. The pioneer women's movement failed Latinas because it did not address the many differences, compared with White middle-class women, that inform a panethnic Latina consciousness. Since the 1960s and 1970s, the feminist movement has infrequently recognized internal differences among women of color, including Latinas. Because Latinas can be of any race, it is no easy task to achieve an inclusive panethnic Latina consciousness that can thrive within a general feminist dialectic. Barriers that threaten a distinct Latina feminism include their exclusion from Eurocentric feminist frameworks and the pervasiveness of “Marianismo” in dominant Latino culture. These barriers were overcome through the emergence of a Chicano feminist consciousness, pan-Latina/o coalition building, and the conceptualization of a panethnic Latina feminism movement that includes the experiences of both Latinas based in the United States and women from Latin America, the Caribbean, and other Spanish-speaking territories and countries. This entry discusses both the barriers and the varieties of emerging Latina feminism.

Barriers to Latina Feminism

Eurocentric Feminist Frameworks

Eurocentric feminist frameworks ignore differences among women in terms of class backgrounds, religious traditions, sexual preferences, races, ages, cultural experiences, and regional variations and instead place the most focus on a middle-class White female reality. Part of the dilemma concerning a Eurocentric feminist framework stems from the White male system through which it appears to operate.

Anne Wilson Schaef introduced the concept of the White male system. As she defined it, this system is managed by and for the advancement and domination of White male leadership, placing women and people of color into an inferior status without regard to their socioeconomic background. This system is maintained through embedded discriminatory practices such as institutionalized racism and modern sexism, she said. According to Schaef's theory, the White male system controls nearly every aspect of Western culture. However, its grip is maintained with subtlety; by law, there are sanctions against outright discrimination on the basis of race, creed, national origin, and the like. Yet according to Schaef, male-dominated Eurocentric frameworks exist in every type of institutionalized setting where people traverse daily—places of employment; institutions of primary, secondary, and higher education; lending and banking organizations; places of religious worship; health care facilities; the military and governmental entities; and noninstitutional settings such as places of residence and community life.

Getting into the White male system is what women and others in Western society have been taught they must do to survive, Schaef asserted; hence, a Latina feminist consciousness works against this system, and its development takes place within this resistance. Schaef proposed that the Latina feminist movement must acknowledge and address four fundamental myths of the White male system. Responding to the myth that the White male system is the only thing that exists, Latina feminists offer a discourse about including differences in ethnicity, race, phenotype, regional culture, religious affiliation, class, generation, political orientation, sexual orientation, and bilingual language acquisition. Latina feminists resist the second myth—that the White male system is innately superior—and contest their imposed inferiority, initiating a dialectic that centers on Latina empowerment and the ways in which they have surmounted obstacles placed before them and have met parity with the status quo. Latina feminists view the third myth—that the White male system knows and understands everything—as not only misleading but also creating an even deeper barrier to equity among all women, especially women of color and in particular Latinas. The fourth myth that Schaef proposed is that it is possible to be totally logical, rational, and objective. Latina feminists argue that people are simply not capable of being totally logical, rational, and objective; considering the various forms of oppression that Latinas and other people of color face, this model is viewed as particularly unrealistic and problematic.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading