Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Ethnonational minorities are politicized groups within a society, where membership in a particular ethnic group(s) forms the basis for their members' mobilization in making collective claims on members of other groups that include a nation's political decision makers. All nations have populations of ethnic minorities—because groups of people from different cultural backgrounds, at different concentration levels, and at different historical periods have migrated the world over and been labeled ethnic by the host societies—but not all ethnic minorities are ethnonational minorities. Ethnonational minorities are present in society when and where claims made by ethnic minority groups become considered and, in many instances, incorporated in how a nation is governed.

Three key points are important for understanding ethnonational minorities and governance: (1) social geography, (2) claim-making, and (3) social rights practice. Social geography refers to the intersection of population size and geographic place, the implication being that the larger the population of the ethnic minority group, the more likely its eventual influence on government (because of potential voting power and demands for resources). Claim-making refers to the intersection of identity politics and contentious politics, through which members of ethnonational minority groups draw from a repertoire of strategies to get their grievances heard and sometimes resolved by governing officials. Finally, social rights practice refers to the process at the intersection of claim-making and citizenship rights in which claims made by ethnonational minorities become generalized to reflect the “public good” of a nation. This entry reviews these elements in describing ethnonational minorities.

Social Geography

Because ethnic groups are not randomly distributed across a nation but are rather concentrated in particular geographic regions or places, the location of ethnonational minorities in a nation tends to be concentrated, as well. For example, the New York metropolitan area has high concentrations of Jewish American, African American, and Hispanic American (especially Dominican) ethnonational minorities; the Los Angeles metro area has a high concentration of Hispanic American (especially Mexican) ethnonational minorities, and the Miami metropolitan area has a high concentration of Hispanic American (especially Cuban) ethnonational minorities. Comparatively, parts of Iraq, Iran, Syria, and Turkey have high concentrations of Kurdish ethnonational minorities; and the Darfur region of the Sudan has high concentrations of Fur African, Masaalit African, and Zaghawa African ethnonational minorities. Regions of a nation that have high concentrations of ethnonational minorities often become the sites of conflict and, often, violence along ethnic lines.

The political significance of social geography and ethnonational minorities is that the greater the density of ethnonational minorities, the more negotiations, cooperation, or competition between groups could potentially occur within a nation's stratified system of power. Thus, how much power ethnonational minorities are perceived to have, relative to the power of ethnonational majorities, becomes important in how legitimate the ethnonational minorities' claims are.

Claim-Making

If politics is “who gets what, when, how,” as Harold Lasswell aptly stated more than 70 years ago, then central to the claim-making of ethnonational minorities is the intersection of identity politics and contentious politics. Identity politics, in the context of ethnonational minorities, is a process of ethnic identification and differentiation in which an individual's or group's shared immigrant, ethnic, or racial identities are considered “natural” characteristics around which co-ethnics collectivize within a stratified system of power (e.g., which ethnic group has what and how, relative to which ethnic group does not have what and how). Moreover, contentious politics is a process of claim-making between different identity groups and their counterparts at the national level, those who hold conventional positions of power, such as elected officials, legislators, cabinet members, ministers, national committee members, and the like.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading