Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

The United States is virtually alone among industrialized countries in maintaining the use of capital punishment. Although the death penalty has been a consistent part of the U.S. legal system, many scholars argue that issues of race and class have always affected its application. They contend that the color of a person's skin plays a major part in determining who ends up on death row, not because of a racist conspiracy against minorities but because of serious flaws in the system that allow for bias and error. Opponents of the death penalty cite discretion by prosecutors, jurors, and judges that may reflect race- and class-based discrimination. Opponents further argue that structural problems in the appellate process make it difficult for mistakes and prejudices to be discovered. Advocates for capital punishment, on the other hand, maintain that it is applied fairly and that procedural safeguards are adequate to prevent its arbitrary or biased usage. This entry examines the historical relationship between race and the death penalty, the constitutional issues surrounding capital punishment, and current issues in the debate about legal executions.

Historical Background

The colonists who settled North America brought with them the English legal system, which included frequent use of the death penalty. There were so many capital crimes in 18th-century British law that it was called the “Bloody Code.” In adapting the law to the New World, the colonists modified the approach to execution. On the one hand, it could be economically unwise to kill valuable slaves given the chronic labor shortage in the colonies, so the colonists used capital punishment less often than their British counterparts did. On the other hand, colonists also developed a longer list of capital offenses as part of the slave codes that governed the “peculiar institution” of slavery. Slaves could be sentenced to death for administering medicine, for burning property, for enticing others to run away, or for striking a White person. Slaves owed their owners absolute obedience, according to the laws of slavery, and that obedience could be enforced through fear and physical punishment, including death. Maintaining the system of slavery involved a balancing act between the financial loss and the deterrent value of a public execution to keep the other slaves “in their place.” The process for condemning a slave to death was simpler than that for White offenders. Instead of a jury trial, justices of the peace could hear and render a speedy judgment in a case where a slave was the defendant. Not surprisingly, such a system resulted in sentencing disparities. In North Carolina, for example, more slaves were executed in a 25-year period than Whites were executed in the entire 18th century.

After the Civil War and the abolition of slavery, the disproportionate application of capital sentences to African Americans continued. From the 1890s through the 1980s, of 5,726 persons legally executed in the United States, more than 54% were non-White. Among 4,736 illegal executions (lynchings), 73% of those killed were Black. Many scholars have argued that the criminal justice system and capital punishment in particular were used as instruments to maintain White supremacy, especially in the South.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading