Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

The term color blindness expresses the ideal of a nonra-cial society wherein skin color is of no consequence for individual life chances or governmental policy. Central tenets of color blindness include nondiscrimination, due process, equality of opportunity, and equal protection of rights under the law. Although the ideal predates the mid-20th century, discourse on color-blindness grew in salience in the 1950s and 1960s in the context of the emergence of the Civil Rights Movement in the United States and antiracist movements abroad. Color blindness stands in opposition to color consciousness and its historical associations with ideologies and practices of segregation and discrimination. While most people agree on these values, there is considerable disagreement on whether such a society has been achieved and on what this should mean for public policy.

On one hand are those who argue that changes in the law in recent decades have produced a color-blind society, one wherein equal protection of the laws is enforced and equal opportunity for all citizens is embraced, regardless of race. They assert that individuals should be judged on the basis of the “content of their character,” not skin color, as in Martin Luther King, Jr.'s well-known formulation. Any further use of color-conscious policy may be a new form of racism, they say.

Others argue that it is premature to declare the achievement of a color-blind society, pointing to considerable evidence of continuing inequities organized around race and ethnicity. According to this perspective, the notion of color blindness serves to paper over continuing inequalities and to foreclose color-conscious policy approaches that are needed in order to act against racial hierarchy. Thus, the seeming normative consensus around color blindness hides a more messy terrain of struggle over how to interpret its meaning. Both viewpoints are briefly explored in this entry.

Mission Accomplished

In the post-civil rights era, commitment to the ideal of color blindness has facilitated the removal of barriers that had for generations blocked the entry of racial minorities into the mainstream economy and society. Legislatures and courts have employed the color-blind ideal to strike down the formal edifice of segregation and eradicate the most blatant manifestations of racial discrimination. In the United States, evidence suggests that public opinion overwhelmingly supports nondiscrimination and the ideal of racial equality, although favorable opinion on the part of Whites tends to waver over the appropriate political measures to pursue or defend the ideal.

Many African Americans also profess commitment to color blindness, but they are more prone to support government race-conscious efforts to achieve racial equality (such as affirmative action or school busing). Moreover, media advertisements, music videos, television, and other sites of popular culture are dominated by multiracial images of friendship and tolerance that celebrate the color-blind society. The ubiquity of support for the color-blind ideal has rendered illegitimate the denial of citizenship rights to people of color that was dominant just a half century ago.

Much internal debate exists, however, with regard to the precise meaning of color blindness and its implications for government policymaking. Some, especially the right wing of the political spectrum, argue that enforcement of nondiscrimination makes the playing field level and so represents the limit of state action. Any measure that violates the color-blind ideal, such as the color-conscious pursuit of poverty alleviation or employment opportunities, for example, represents illiberal race preferences or even “reverse racism,” they argue. Departure from the color-blind ideal is thought to promote racial divisiveness, inflict fresh harms on Whites (by denying equal protection of the laws), and stigmatize beneficiaries of color-conscious remedies such as affirmative action.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading