Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Emerging from a grant authorized by the Carnegie Corporation seeking an objective and comprehensive study of the Negro in the United States, An American Dilemma: The Negro Problem and American Democracy is a groundbreaking examination of Black-White race relations in the United States. Prior to the publication of An American Dilemma in 1944, the predominant theory of race relations built on the work of Robert Park and the “Chicago School” that viewed race relations as a process of competition and conflict that would ultimately be resolved once the minority group first accommodated and finally assimilated to the majority culture. An American Dilemma challenged the assumptions of the Chicago School by focusing on the responsibility of the majority population (in this case White Americans) in exacerbating racial tensions and placing the solution for racial inequality in their hands. Compiled from exhaustive research beginning in 1939 (and continuing despite the outbreak of World War II), An American Dilemma was published in 1944 and immediately became the inspiration for American liberalism's approach toward rectifying racial inequity over the next 30 years.

Project Beginnings

Credited with instigating the project that would produce An American Dilemma, Newton D. Baker, a Carnegie Corporation board member, suggested that a solution to the “Negro problem” required attention to the condition of Blacks in the North as well as in the South, and in October 1935 he proposed that the Carnegie Corporation sponsor a study on the condition of urban Blacks. Rather than selecting from the ranks of U.S. social scientists to direct their study, the Carnegie Corporation board sought a scholar personally unconnected to the nation's racial history and, therefore, theoretically free from charges of ideological bias in his or her findings. The board selected Gunnar Myrdal, a social economist at the University of Stockholm and a member of the Swedish Senate, as the study's general director, primarily because Sweden's history was free from imperialism or colonialism, a fact that would reassure African Americans that the resulting study would be completely impartial. Ironically, Baker and the other board members (many of whom disapproved of President Franklin D. Roosevelt's New Deal and government-controlled social programs) overlooked Myrdal's belief in the power of government-legislated social reform, a particularly liberal worldview that would significantly influence the study's direction as well as its final conclusions.

Research, Methodology, and Findings

Myrdal, on accepting the commission, immediately began familiarizing himself with the existing scholarship on U.S. race relations. He visited the U.S. South on a two-month “exploratory journey” to develop his own personal understanding of U.S. race relations. In 1939, he began planning the study, collaborating with dozens of noted U.S. social scientists, including Robert Park, Charles S. Johnson, Ruth Benedict, Franz Boas, Ralph Bunche, W. E. B. Du Bois, Melville Herskovits, and E. Franklin Frazier. Following these consultations, Myrdal largely rejected the isolated focus on urban and northern African Americans originally envisioned by Baker and instead made an already ambitious project even more so by widening the scope of the study to understand all aspects of African American life in the United States and to document the opinions held by the U.S. populace regarding the proper status and treatment given to African Americans. Understanding the impact that the study's findings would have on the African American community, leaders of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP), the Urban League, and the Commission of Interracial Cooperation all gave considerable research assistance to the project, including providing unfettered access to their organizations' archives. Myrdal, seeking the input of a Black social scientist, selected E. Franklin Frazier as the primary reviewer of the in-progress chapters. Frazier, originally skeptical of Myrdal's ability as a foreigner to decipher the peculiarities of U.S. race relations, generally approved of the submitted chapters and Myrdal's assessments.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading