Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

There seems to be a convergence of opinion among researchers in the area of well-being that the notion of well-being can be construed in terms of happiness, life satisfaction, and absence of ill-being. Happiness refers to an affective state that involves positive and negative affect. This affect derives from positive and negative emotional reactions we experience from life events. Happiness researchers make the distinction between short-term happiness and long-term happiness. Short-term happiness is mostly influenced by environmental factors, whereas long-term happiness is more dispositional.

Life satisfaction involves cognitive evaluation of one's life. Life satisfaction is a result of comparison of one's current life situations or accomplishments against certain standards of comparison—one's ideal life, expectations of personal utility, individual goals, values, needs, opulence, and the lives of significant others. Also, life satisfaction is a cognitive evaluation of happiness in relation to salient life domains. For example, people may infer that they are highly satisfied with their lives if they judge themselves to be happy in work, family, and social life, and given that these life domains are important to them.

The absence of ill-being reflects the health perspective of well-being. This perspective posits that absence of ill-being is a necessary but not sufficient condition of subjective well-being. In other words, people cannot experience high levels of happiness and life satisfaction if they are unhappy with their health. Satisfaction with health is a prerequisite to overall happiness and satisfaction with life.

In the following section, we will focus on the effects of organizations on people's well-being. Organizations affect people's well-being (happiness, life satisfaction, and absence of ill-being) in at least two major ways, work and consumption. In other words, people assume certain jobs in organizations, and their well-being is significantly affected by these jobs and employment circumstances. Organizations also affect people's well-being by offering consumers goods and services that help consumers satisfy their needs. As such, we will describe how organizations affect well-being in relation to two important life domains, namely, work life (i.e., employee well-being) and consumer life (i.e., consumer well-being).

Employee Well-Being

Employee well-being, also called quality of work life (QWL), refers to the degree of satisfaction and contentedness an employee experiences with respect to his or her job and the overall work situation. Much research on QWL has linked specific organizational characteristics and programs to concepts such as employee life satisfaction, happiness, and absence of ill-being. We will highlight some of the important organizational characteristics and programs found to enhance employee well-being.

Employee Well-Being can be Enhanced through Ethical Corporate Mission and Culture

Research has shown that the ethical corporate mission and culture of an organization can influence employee productivity and job satisfaction. Employees believe that being associated with an ethical organization gives them a sense of meaning and purpose in their work. Examples of organizations that contribute meaning and a sense of purpose in work include the religious-based or values-based organizations, where the founders or managers are guided by general religious or philosophical principles.

Employee Well-Being can be Enhanced through Teamwork

Research has shown that teamwork characterized by reciprocal trust and respect among team members serve to enhance employee productivity and job satisfaction. Teamwork can be induced through role clarification (clarifying and negotiating role expectations of each team member), problem solving (educating team members on how to solve problems by first defining the problem, followed by generating possible alternatives for corrective action, selecting the best alternative, implementing the corrective action, and monitoring the outcome of the corrective action), goal clarification and prioritization (the team is instructed to develop measurable performance goals and prioritize these goals), and conflict resolution (the team is taught how to resolve conflicts through a built-in process to review decisions, team members are induced to learn more about the specialty fields of one another through planned mutual instructions, roles are clarified, and greater communication and openness are encouraged).

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading