Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

The primary focus of stakeholder theory has been the proposition that firms have a moral responsibility to take into account the interests of stakeholders other than just stockholders. Given the focus on the corporation within organization studies, this emphasis in theorizing is understandable. The emphasis on corporate responsibility to stakeholders has not to date been balanced by a complementary focus on the responsibilities of stakeholders. Though some models within the stakeholder literature portray a two-way relationship between the firm and the stakeholder, writers predominantly argue that firms are responsible for taking into account stakeholder interests, without noting the reciprocal moral responsibility of stakeholders to consider the interests of the firm in their actions and policies. A focus on stakeholder responsibility compels theorists, corporations, and stakeholders to direct greater attention to the importance of the responsibilities stakeholders have to firms and to other stakeholders who are part of the collective enterprise.

Corporate Responsibility and Stakeholder Theory

With the emergence of stakeholder theory in the mid1980s and its rapid growth up to the present time, numerous writers questioned the primacy of corporate responsibility to shareholders. Writers building the foundation of stakeholder theory argued for expanding the domain of corporate responsibility beyond shareholders to include a number of critical stakeholder groups.

Over time, the legitimacy of the stakeholder perspective has grown and has influenced the direction of work in business ethics, organization theory, and the strategic management literature. Stakeholder theorists have argued for managers to acknowledge the moral “stake” of stakeholders by paying attention to stakeholders and their interests for both prudential reasons (i.e., it is good for the firm and its profitability to listen to stakeholders) and normative reasons (i.e., they argue that there are compelling moral arguments for considering stakeholder interests).

Corporate and Stakeholder Responsibility

As noted above, there has been a lack of attention to the fundamental question of whether stakeholders have moral responsibilities to firms. This is not to say that the topic of stakeholder responsibility has been completely ignored by business ethics writers. A series of articles and books were published in 2002 to 2003 that attempted to establish a conceptual foundation for stakeholder responsibility. This work emphasized the importance of stakeholders assuming responsibility for negative outcomes associated with actions directed to firms and other stakeholders and reinforced contemporary notions of responsibility in terms of accountability and responsiveness.

There are other ways of understanding responsibility in relation to stakeholders. Tracing the term back to its Latin roots (respondere), responsibility literally means to pledge back. In contrast to notions of responsibility that focus on an externally imposed obligation, this form emphasizes the idea of people and organizations choosing to pledge things to each other to foster cooperation and a better life for all. This definition of responsibility extends what it means to be a stakeholder beyond the traditional definition of stakeholders as individuals, groups, or organizations potentially affected by the actions and policies of an organization. Stakeholders are not only the recipients of organizational actions but actors as well with reciprocal responsibility for the implications of their actions in relation to firms and other stakeholders.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading