Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Social auditing refers to the process of identifying, analyzing, measuring, evaluating, and monitoring the impact of an organization's operations on different stakeholder groups. The auditing process is carried out in five steps.

First, an exhaustive enumeration of the organization's social activities is compiled into a social data bank. Since compiling such a data set may prove to be a daunting task, due to the wide range of social activities that the organization performs, a lengthy and well-planned study may be required.

Second, the compiled data are analyzed such that the meaning and cost-benefit ratios of the social activities may be inferred. Analysis is conducted by using sophisticated statistical analysis tools and expert judgment.

Third, the impacts of the organization's activities on different stakeholder groups are measured. Since measures of social effects are not as well-developed as economic measures, proxies such as opinion and attitude measures are usually used.

Fourth, social performance is evaluated. The effectiveness of the organization's social activities is assessed by comparing actual performance to standards developed using norms and goals. The more clear and specific the norms and goals are, the more accurate the evaluation is. Fifth, continuous monitoring of social effects is maintained.

The success of the social audit depends on the accuracy of the steps discussed above. In addition, three recommendations need to be met. First, the social audit needs to strictly adhere to the selected norms and goals used as standards in the evaluation step. Second, the results of the social audit need to be integrated into the decisionmaking process of the corporation in the form of feedback as an integral part of the management of the company's social activities. Third, the social audit has to be carried out by competent and skilled professionals who are knowledgeable of the relevant social issues and problems.

The Evolution of Social Auditing

As different stakeholder groups, especially interest groups, increased their pressure on business organizations to pursue more socially responsible goals, and as the notion of corporate social responsibility gained more acceptance, business organizations started responding to their stakeholders' demands. Businesses' responses materialized in efforts such as natural environment awareness programs and equal employment opportunity initiatives. However, a suspicious public demanded measures to assess businesses' social impact, similar to the economic measures that assess a corporation's economic impact. Corporate social performance had to be accounted for. Simply portraying a socially responsible image through a corporate public relations office was not enough any more. The need for a rigorous process that accurately assesses corporate social performance and holds corporations accountable for their practices was clear. Time has come for social auditing.

Types of Social Audits

Research and practice produced several types of social audits. There are six major types of social audits: (1) the social balance sheet and income statement, (2) the social performance audit, (3) the macromicro social indicator audit, (4) the constituency group attitudes audit, (5) the government-mandated audits, and (6) the social process/program management audit. These six types of audits vary with respect to the intent for which they are conducted, the methods used, the scope covered, and the audit report form. In addition, the group conducting the audit varies among the several types. Following is a brief summary of the six major types of social audits.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading