Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Recalls, Voluntary

Consumer product recalls occur frequently. In 2000, there were at least 2,523 voluntary recalls. Recalls publicize product dangers and request that consumers return the defective product for repair or replacement. In fact, the recall is a specific type of communication campaign full of ethical considerations. Federal regulatory agencies involved with recalls include the Food and Drug Administration, with 1,915 recalls in 2000, and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration and Consumer Product Safety Commission, with similar totals of 227 and 207 recalls in 2000, respectively. There were 76 U.S. Department of Agriculture recalls in 2000, 32 at the Environmental Protection Agency and 23 at the U.S. Coast Guard.

Ethical Issues in Recalls

Recalls raise a number of ethical questions. There are about a dozen specific recall ethics issues. Ethics must be considered a primary factor in recall campaigns and the ad hoc American recall system.

The Decision to Recall

An initial ethics issue involves the corporate decision to recall a product. Are such decisions made out of a sense of corporate social responsibility or out of fear of facing a recall order from a regulatory agency? Most recalls are probably motivated not by ethical values and beliefs but by fear of the consequences of not recalling.

Recalls were originally intended as remedies only when public safety was at stake. However, there have been recent cases of recalls of tabloid magazines because they contained illegally taken photographs of Jennifer Aniston and Brad Pitt at a nude beach and a recall of T-shirts because they were considered obscene.

Silent Recalls

Silent recalls, as the title implies, are not generally publicized. In some cases, there is no communication at all. This seemingly incongruous situation results from corporate fear of strongly worded recall warning communication. Manufacturers sometimes convince regulators to avoid publicity in lieu of relying on “internal” communication between manufacturers, distributors, and retailers.

Silent recalls are not uncommon. Between 1995 and 1997, 15 of 51 U.S. Department of Agriculture recalls were not publicized. Instead, the Department accepted a recall plan relying exclusively on intercorporate communication. The ethical adequacy of recalls without any public communication is questionable.

The Duty to Recall

Court decisions have consistently recognized a corporate duty to recall, but that duty has always been quite limited. Recalls are a corporate duty only when there is a widespread severe public safety threat. Does limited legal duty imply a limited ethical responsibility? In the late 1980s and throughout the 1990s, there was a trend away from court-ordered recalls. However, failure to voluntarily recall or comply with regulatory recall requests might result in product liability litigation exposure.

Are Voluntary Recalls Really Voluntary?

The American recall system appears to be one thing but is actually another, in a sense. According to recall legislation, virtually all recalls are called voluntary, unless a court order is required. However, these voluntary recalls only occur after significant regulatory pressure. Is it unethical to refer to recalls as being voluntary when in fact they are not?

Political Interference with Recalls

The recalling regulatory agencies are subject to political influence. They are part of the executive branch of the government and respond to political pressure. There has been typically less recall activity during Republican administrations.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading