Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

The word logos was used in Greek philosophy to refer to rationality. Logos was adopted by the Romans as ratio, which became rationality in English. Rationality, like ethics, is considered a uniquely human characteristic, a characteristic that distinguishes humans from other life-forms. Aristotle used logos to describe humans as rational animals, animals that are capable of knowing in the cognitive and moral sense. This Aristotelean notion of the interdependency between rationality and ethics is a characteristic broadly accepted in classical Greek philosophy.

In Roman and medieval times, rationality was associated with religious thought and belief. This association was severed during the Renaissance and the Enlightenment, when the relationship between ethics and religion was questioned. As a consequence, rationality became the characteristic of autonomous persons who possessed the capacity to develop their own morality because of their capacity to be rational and were in no need of external authority or imposed values.

In addition to the focus on the individual during the Enlightenment, rationality became associated with scientific method and gave birth to the rationalist school of thought. This school of thought claims that knowledge and truth are based on reason, not on external sources or value judgments. Rationality then became associated with utility in value-free science. This development led to scientific rationality, which is based on positivism, the perspective that perceives value judgments as incapable of being rational, and rational judgments as those that relate to utility.

Rationality underwent radical transformations in its journey through history. From the coexistence of rationality and ethics during the classical Greek period, rationality became the source of morality during the Enlightenment. More recently, rationality is generally associated with utility and efficiency rather than ethics.

Types of Rationality

Rationality is generally distinguished as being theoretical or practical. Theoretical rationality is associated with beliefs and knowledge, while practical rationality is associated with intentions and behavior about what is the good thing to do. Practical rationality provides the explanation and justification for behavior.

Alastair MacIntyre explains three main positions on practical rationality. The first is based on acting for one's self-interest. Action in this perspective is based on the calculation of costs and benefits of different alternatives. The second position of rationality is based on the capacity to act impartially toward your own interests but in accordance with the constraints accepted by any rational person. This view makes rationality a standard that can provide a benchmark for human behavior. The third view sees rationality as the capacity to act in ways that bring out the inherent goodness of human beings.

Ethical Theories and Rationality

The three main schools of thought of ethics are deontological or duty based, teleological or consequence based, and virtue ethics. Deontological and teleological ethics contend that ethics is a function of rationality. Virtue ethics, without eradicating the importance of rationality, contends that ethics is primarily concerned with the cultivation of character, and it emphasizes individual virtue and integrity. The character disposes the person to act ethically, so what is important is to develop a strong character. The cultivation of character is important, according to virtue ethics, and happens before the rationalization of actions and the formulation of principles.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading