Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Intrinsic value is traditionally understood to be the value a thing has in virtue of its own nature, or its own intrinsic properties. Thus, a thing has intrinsic value “in itself” or “for its own sake” or “in its own right.” This implies that intrinsic value is “nonderivative” or “nonrelational” since things that have intrinsic value do not have it because of their relation to other things. For example, many writers argue that pleasure is intrinsically valuable because pleasure is good in itself and not because of its relation to something else. Other things sometimes said to be intrinsically valuable are, for example, happiness, virtuous acts, knowledge, or experiences of beauty, friendship, or love. Contrasted with intrinsic value is extrinsic value, which is the value a thing has in virtue of its relation to something else and not in itself or in its own right.

Final Goods and Instrumental Goods

Closely related to the distinction between intrinsic and extrinsic value is one between final goods and instrumental goods. Final goods are things desired or chosen for themselves or for their own sake. Instrumental goods are means or methods selected to accomplish final goods. For example, suppose you are looking at job openings on the Internet. Someone asks you why you are doing this. You reply, “I am trying to find a job.” The rest of the conversation continues—Why do you want a job? So I can make money. Why do you want money? So I can provide my family with a decent standard of living. Why do you want to do that? So I can be happy. Why do you want to be happy?—Now what do you answer? Probably that you do not want to be happy for the sake of something else but for itself. Thus, happiness is your final good, and all the steps you take to achieve happiness, the means you use to move toward that goal, are instrumental goods.

Final Goods and Intrinsic Value

A controversial issue is how to characterize the relation between intrinsic and extrinsic value on one hand, and final and instrumental goods on the other. Consider first the relation between intrinsic value and final goods. There are several possibilities. One is that something is intrinsically valuable if and only if it is a final good. Thus, all final goods are intrinsically valuable, and only final goods are intrinsically valuable. If so, to say that something is intrinsically valuable is just to say that someone values that thing for itself or as a final good. Call this possibility “subjectivism” since intrinsic value is tied to what is desired or chosen for its own sake by some person.

A second possibility is “modest objectivism.” Modest objectivists believe that the only things that are intrinsically valuable are certain human experiences. However, they deny that what makes such experiences intrinsically valuable is that they are valued for themselves, that is, that they are final goods. Instead, they argue that some experiences are intrinsically valuable by virtue of their own nature or their own intrinsic properties. For example, modest objectivists claim that happiness is valuable in itself or in its own right and not merely because happiness is valued for itself by some people.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading