Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Feminist ethics is a diverse set of gender-focused approaches to ethical theory and practice. The primary aims of feminist ethics are (1) to examine the traits, virtues, and values that have been culturally tied to women worldwide, but particularly in the Western world; and (2) to determine whether they have been wrongly assessed and underused by much of traditional (Western) ethical thought. According to philosopher Alison M. Jaggar, many schools of traditional (Western) ethics fail women in five interrelated ways. First, they focus far more on men's issues, interests, and rights than on women's. Second, they approach problems that arise in the private or domestic realm as morally uninteresting or trivial. Third, they imply that for a variety of biological as well as social reasons, women are not as morally developed as men. Fourth, they privilege traits linked to masculinity (autonomy, separation, mind, culture, and transcendence) over traits linked to femininity (interdependence, community, connection, body, emotion, nature, and immanence) as if the latter traits were not just as essential for human beings to cultivate as the former. Fifth, they present masculine modes of moral reasoning that emphasize rules, universality, and impartiality as somehow better than feminine modes of moral reasoning that emphasize relationships, particularity, and partiality when, in point of fact, both these modes of moral reasoning are equally capable of yielding wise moral judgments.

Historical Background

Feminist ethics has its roots in 18th- and 19th-century debates about the nature and function of women's morality. Thinkers such as Mary Wollstonecraft, John Stuart Mill, Harriet Taylor Mill, Catherine Beecher, Charlotte Perkins Gilman, and Elizabeth Cady Stanton posed questions such as the following: Are women's feminine traits produced biologically and/or socially? Is there a nonbiased standard available to distinguish “good” feminine traits from “bad” ones? Is women's morality different from men's, and, if it is, why? Is ethics gender neutral or gender specific? Should women and men be held accountable to the same set of moral rules or to different ones?

Because 18th- and 19th-century feminist thinkers had different answers to the questions posed in the foregoing, it is not surprising that 20th-century feminist ethicists should have developed a variety of approaches to ethics. Despite their diversity, however, all feminist approaches to ethics use gender as their primary category of analysis and women's experiences as their primary source of empirical data. They can be divided into two basic types: care-focused feminist ethics and power-focused feminist ethics. Because these two fundamental approaches to feminist ethics stress different concepts, concerns, and controversies, they are able to check and balance as well as complement each other.

Care-Focused Feminist Ethics

Care-focused feminist ethics include a cluster of socalled feminine and maternal approaches to ethics that put a premium on those moral virtues that tend to strengthen people's felt commitments to each other. Whereas feminine approaches to ethics stress the value of human relationships in general, maternal approaches to ethics focus on the value of one type of human relationship in particular, namely the motherchild relationship. The strengths of feminine and maternal approaches to ethics are many, but they are offset by some significant weaknesses as discussed in the following.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading