Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Stress is one of the most talked about psychosocial constructs in popular discourse. We invoke the language of stress when we want sympathy, to convey that we feel inundated by demands, responsibility, or worry. The harried young mother in a store, a student at exam time, and the busy corporate executive are all familiar images of the stressed individual. Less prominent in the popular imagination is the stress of the impoverished, the unemployed, those facing discrimination, and outcasts at the margins of society. Stress is central to the study of health disparities because the disadvantaged members of society bear it in disproportion.

In its epidemiological sense, stress is a way to characterize those aspects of experiencing the social and physical environment that influence the wellbeing of individuals. A variety of definitions have been put forth, but a prevailing theme is that stress results either from socioenvironmental demands that strain the adaptive capacity of the individual or from the absence of means for the individual to obtain desired ends. Stress therefore is not strictly an attribute of the environment but arises from discrepancies between social conditions and characteristics of the individual. Similar to stress in engineering, psychosocial stress can be thought of as a force on a resisting body that flexes within, but may exceed, a normal range. Social stress research differs from engineering in that it treats the capacity to resist as a separate construct, that of coping. Epidemiologists also distinguish stressors from distress: Stressors refer to the environmental stimulus, while distress is the psychological or behavioral response to the stressor. This entry will describe the origin and development of stress concepts, the continuum of stress, stress as a process, and social patterns of stress exposure.

Origin and Development of Stress Concepts

Early-20th-century investigations with laboratory animals suggested that emotion-provoking stimuli produce physiological changes related to the fight or flight response. It was soon recognized that persistent stimuli of this type could produce physical illness. Cases of clinical pathology in humans were noted to follow severe emotional trauma, and eventually, physicians were trained to use a life chart as a diagnostic tool. By the mid-20th century, the general adaptation syndrome was posited as a mechanism by which physical environmental stressors could lead to diseases of adaptation. This led the way for the investigation of psychosocial stimuli as potential stressors, and soon life stresses became accepted risk factors for disease, especially psychosomatic disease. Stress events represented a change in a person's life, and hence the need to adapt. The life event checklist, which typically provided a count of life change events over the preceding 6 months or year, was a standard tool to rate the level of stress in people's lives. By the late 20th century, it was accepted that only undesired change, and not change per se, constituted stress. The field of social epidemiology has generally not pursued the biophysiological mechanisms by which the experience of negative events can produce illness, although some scientists now study the related concepts of allostasis and allostatic load.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading