Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

In 1977, Albert Bandura introduced the concept of self-efficacy, which is defined as the conviction that one can successfully execute the behavior required to produce a specific outcome. Unlike efficacy, which is the power to produce an effect (i.e., competence), self-efficacy is the belief that one has the power to produce that effect. Self-efficacy plays a central role in the cognitive regulation of motivation, because people regulate the level and the distribution of effort they will expend in accordance with the effects they are expecting from their actions. Self-efficacy is the focal point of Bandura's social-cognitive theory as well as an important component of the health belief model.

Theories and models of human behavior change are used to guide health promotion and disease prevention efforts. Self-efficacy is an important psychosocial concept for epidemiologists to understand because it influences study participants’ behavior, intervention uptake, and potential for long-term program maintenance. Ignoring the role that psychosocial concepts, such as self-efficacy, play in intervention efforts may cause study effects to be misinterpreted and project results to be misattributed. For instance, individuals participating in a smoking cessation program may be given solid smoking cessation strategies, social support, and alternative stress reduction activities, but if they do not believe that they can stop smoking—that is, if they lack self-efficacy—the program will be less successful. On the other hand, if a smoking cessation expert recognizes that overcoming an individual's lack of self-efficacy to stop smoking is critical to his or her quitting, the program could readily be designed with this factor in mind, and the program evaluation could determine the success of raising self-efficacy. Understanding self-efficacy can shed light on the determinants of health and disease distributions.

Factors Influencing Self-Efficacy

Bandura points to four sources affecting selfefficacy—experience, modeling, social persuasions, and physiological factors. Experiencing mastery is the most important factor for deciding a person's selfefficacy; success raises self-efficacy, failure lowers it. During modeling, an individual observes another engage in a behavior; when the other succeeds at the behavior, the observing individual's self-efficacy will increase—particularly if the observed person is similar in meaningful ways to the person doing the observation. In situations where others are observed failing, the observer's self-efficacy to accomplish a similar task will decrease. Social persuasions relate to encouragement and discouragement. These can be influential—most people remember times where something said to them severely altered their confidence. Positive persuasions generally increase self-efficacy, and negative persuasions decrease it. Unfortunately, it is usually easier to decrease someone's self-efficacy than it is to increase it. Physiologic factors play an important role in self-efficacy as well. Often, during stressful situations, people may exhibit physical signs of discomfort, such as shaking, upset stomach, or sweating. A person's perceptions of these responses can markedly alter his or her self-efficacy. If a person gets ‘butterflies in the stomach’ before public speaking, a person with low self-efficacy may take this as a sign of his or her inability, thus decreasing efficacy further. Thus, it is how the person interprets the physiologic response that affects self-efficacy rather than the physiologic response per se.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading