Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

The term effect modification has been applied to two distinct phenomena. For the first phenomenon, effect modification simply means that some chosen measure of effect varies across levels of background variables. This phenomenon is thus more precisely termed effect-measure modification, and in the statistics literature it is more often termed heterogeneity or interaction. Referring to the second phenomenon, effect modification means that the mechanism of effect differs with background variables, which is known in the biomedical literature as dependent action or (again) ‘interaction.’ The two phenomena are often confused, as reflected by the use of the same terms (effect modification and interaction) for both. In fact, they have only limited points of contact.

Effect-Measure Modification (Heterogeneity)

To make the concepts and distinctions precise, suppose we are studying the effects that changes in a variable X will have on a subsequent variable Y, in the presence of a background variable Z that precedes X and Y. For example, X might be treatment level such as dose or treatment arm, Y might be a health outcome variable such as life expectancy following treatment, and Z might be sex (1 = female,0 = male). To measure effects, write Yx for the outcome one would have if administered treatment level x of X; for example, if X = 1 for active treatment, X = 0 for placebo, then Y1 is the outcome a subject will have if X = 1is administered, and Y0 is the outcome a subject will have if X = 0 is administered. The Yx are often called potential outcomes.

One measure of the effect of changing X from 0 to 1 on the outcome is the difference Y1Y0; for example, if Y were life expectancy, Y1Y0 would be the change in life expectancy. If this difference varied with sex in a systematic fashion, one could say that the difference was modified by sex, or that there was heterogeneity of the difference across sex. Another common measure of effect is the ratio Y1=Y0; if this ratio varied with sex in a systematic fashion, one could say that the ratio was modified by sex.

For purely algebraic reasons, two measures may be modified in very different ways by the same variable. Furthermore, if both X and Z affect Y, absence of modification of the difference implies modification of the ratio, and vice versa. As a simple example, suppose for the subjects under study Y1 = 20 and Y0 = 10 for all the males, but Y1 = 30 and Y0 = 15 for all the females. Then Y1Y0 = 10 for males but Y1Y0 = 15 for females, so there is a 5-year modification of the difference measure by sex. But suppose we measured the effects by expectancy ratios Y1/Y0, instead of differences. Then Y1/Y0 = 20= 10 = 2 for males and Y1/Y0 = 30= 15 = 2 for females as well, so there is no modification of the ratio measure by sex.

Consider next an example in which Y1 = 20 and Y0 = 10 for all the males, and Y1 = 30 and Y0 = 20 for all the females. Then Y1Y0 = 10 for both males and females, so there is no modification of the difference by sex. But Y1/Y0 = 20/10 = 2 for males and Y1/Y0 = 30/20 = 1.5 for females, so there is modification of the ratio by sex.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading