Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

The wise use movement is a conglomeration of grassroots activists and organizations presenting an alternative philosophy regarding resource extraction and access on U.S. public lands. The movement started in the late 1980s by a handful of influentials such as Ron Arnold, Chuck “Rent-a-Riot” Cushman, and Allan Gottlieb. Arnold has been Executive Vice President of the Center for the Defense of Free Enterprise since 1984, and was honored as the “Father of the Wise Use movement.” His blatant and harsh criticism of environmentalists has made him a veritable spokesperson for the movement.

The authors (Maughan & Nilson) identified the seven predominant strategies of the movement:

(1) bills itself as the “true” environmental movement; (2) tries to marginalize environmental groups by highlighting the views and actions of the radical fringe of environmentalism, and in other ways promote the perception that environmentalists are atypical of the public; (3) downplays threats to the environment; (4) tries to form coalitions with interests who perceive they have been harmed or are threatened with harm from environmental policies; (5) forms coalitions with groups that share part of the Old West ideology; (6) stresses the economic costs of environmental policy; and (7) creates the perception that the real goal of environmentalists is attainment of authoritarian power.

Overall, the Wise Use movement is regarded by many in and outside of the movement as “anti-environmental.” A quick look at the Wise Use Agenda reveals a philosophy that is in many regards contrary to the policies advocated by environmentalists, conservation organizations, and U.S. federal agencies.

Since there are numerous Wise Use organizations that focus on a myriad of specific issues, the goals stated below are not supported by every Wise Use group. However, at a Multiple Use Strategy Conference in Reno, Nevada in August 1988 sponsored by Ron Arnold's Center for the Defense of Free Enterprise, Wise Use organizations collaborated on their mutual concerns about resource management. As a result of the conference, Alan Gottlieb compiled The Wise Use Agenda, a book detailing the goals of the movement. Note that many of the policies presented were subsequently adopted by the George W. Bush administration. The first 10 goals are stated below:

  • Initiation of a Wise Use public education project by the U.S. Forest Service explaining the wise commodity use of the national forests and all federal lands (to reduce the federal deficit).
  • Immediate wise development of the petroleum resources of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge in Alaska.
  • Advocate the passage of an Inholders Protection Act, giving broader property rights to inholders (persons who own land within the borders or tangent to federal or state lands).
  • Passage of the Global Warming Protection Act that works to remove all decaying matter from national forests to be replaced by young stands of carbon-dioxide absorbing trees.
  • Designate 3 million acres in the Tongass National Forest in Alaska for timber harvest.
  • Open all public lands (including wilderness areas and national parks) to mining and energy production.
  • Assert states' sovereign rights in matters pertaining to water distribution and regulation.
  • Commemorate the one hundredth anniversary of the founding of the Forest Service by calling attention to the commodity use of forests and the homestead settlement of these areas.
  • Increase harvesting of trees in national forests to promote “rural, timber-dependent community stability” through the Rural Community Stability Act.
  • These sales will be exempt from administrative appeal. Create a national timber harvesting system that allows for greater harvesting of timber on public lands.

Many of the individual groups within the Wise Use movement were at one time funded in part by the oil, off-road (recreation), timber, mining, and ranching industries, as well as anti-environmental politicians. In 2001 the Sierra Club reported that Boise Cascade Company (timber company), DuPont (chemical manufacturers), and Chevron (gas and oil company), at one time funded Wise Use movement conferences. However, many of the corporate interests quickly soured on the wise-use groups' overheated rhetoric (and sometimes aggressive tactics) and pulled their funding.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading