Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Federal Land Policy and Management Act (FLPMA)

After the bureau of Land Management (BLM) began formal planning for public lands under its charge in 1969, the Federal Land Policy and Management Act (FLPMA) of 1976 was passed due to congressional dissatisfaction with BLM land and resource management. According to the BLM, “FLPMA is called the BLM Organic Act because it consolidated and articulated BLM's management responsibilities.” The FLPMA is a BLM-specific law. The statute reduces agency flexibility, increases agency accountability to itself and Congress, and dictates an “intensive, but imprecise planning process” that requires “vast bureaucratic resources and produce[s] mountains of paperwork.”

Under FLPMA, decisionmakers at the BLM are required to consider the interests of all public land users before they determine how lands will be managed. The statute was ultimately designed to address natural scarcity of both renewable and nonrenewable resources (grazing, timber, minerals, recreation, wilderness, fish and wildlife, watershed, and so on).

Section 202 of FLPMA broadly guides land use planning and does not detail the steps by which BLM should generate and revise land use plans. Some of the more important management requirements of FLPMA for the BLM to observe principles of multiple use and sustained yield; use a systematic interdisciplinary approach (physical, biological, economic, cultural); give priority to the designation of areas of critical environmental concern; consider the relative scarcity of the values and alternatives for realizing those values; weigh long-versus shortterm benefits; comply with pollution control laws; and coordinate with other federal, state, tribal, and local government entities.

Management of BLM Lands

As the largest land management agency in the United States, the BLM is responsible for 175 million acres (70 million hectares) in the lower 48 states. The FLPMA is in essence a guiding statute for the management of those lands. The FLPMA also mandated that the agency perform a roadless area review for the selection of Wilderness Study Areas, study the areas, “and make Wilderness recommendations to Congress by 1991.” After an incomplete review of only 25 million acres (10 million hectares), the BLM proposed 328 wilderness units totaling 9.7 million acres.

The FLPMA also requires that the BLM highlight the designation and protection of areas of critical environmental concern (ACEC). An ACEC includes lands where special management attention is required to prevent irreparable damage to important scenic values, fish and wildlife resources or other natural systems or processes. By the year 2000, the BLM had designated about 13 million acres of ACECs, with 5.9 million acres located in Alaska. Many of these ACECs are sensitive riparian zones around rivers or are important wildlife areas like the Big Morongo Canyon in California, which is a wildlife corridor, lambing area, and watering area for desert bighorn sheep.

The FLPMA's guidance of BLM's facilitation and management of public-lands livestock grazing is a very contentious issue between the BLM and conservationists, as many environmental advocates believe the BLM is understaffed and underfunded, leading to detrimental harm to the range resource. The FLPMA requires the agency to set grazing fees, analyze the value of grazing, grant 10-year grazing permits, and establish grazing advisory boards.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading