Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Spatial equity analysis examines the fair allocation of public resources within units of government at the local, regional, and national levels. Distribution of public investments is considered fair when it is needs based irrespective of the demographic and socioeconomic profiles of each community.

Some of these distributions, of course, go to transportation investments, to the extent that historic developments in each locale have resulted in the separation of different land uses. Thus, transportation funds are needed for travel for a variety of reasons, such as commuting from and to work, traveling from and to a school, making shopping and business trips, visiting a doctor, and so forth.

It is relevant to examine, for example, whether a particular transit investment would assist the employability status of central-city minority workers facing housing segregation in the face of the suburbanization of entry-level jobs in the manufacturing or services sectors of the economy. In this case, the analysis may examine whether the minority community's welfare is improved with respect to job accessibility, commuting duration, and earnings.

A careful analysis could also determine, in this context, that longer commuting distances among workers of a particular racial group were not the result of housing segregation but rather a result of selective migration among members of that racial group, who may have chosen to live farther away from jobs as a trade-off for better access to quality education for their children.

Another possible investigation may be concerned with how minorities' welfare varies geographically, or by gender, age, race and ethnicity, and education attainment. For example, one question could be whether employment security of female workers from minority communities is the effect of job retention (i.e., tenure with the same employer) or of employment retention (i.e., keeping jobs but with different employers), possibly with a trend toward upward mobility.

The next question might be, does vehicle access increase employment retention, or, more importantly, how many job opportunities can be accessed by a private vehicle (versus public transit systems) within reasonable travel time? Finally, do female minorities with a high school diploma, when given the appropriate accessibility and location opportunities, enjoy increased job retention?

A Case Study Example

In a planning study of the Chicago metropolitan area, authors examined in depth the transportation component of the welfare-to-work problem and provided strong support for the spatial mismatch hypothesis facing welfare clients and the unemployed. The study found the following:

  • The spatial distribution of welfare clients and entry-level jobs imposed challenges for transit service providers because clients and jobs were dispersed throughout the metropolitan area.
  • Welfare clients were likely to face significant difficulties in accessing jobs because of long distances and their need to access jobs through heavily congested urban areas, which resulted in extremely high door-to-door travel times between residential origins and job destinations, whether trips were by private automobile or existing transit services.
  • There were wide variations in the travel times to job destinations from different neighborhoods. Some neighborhoods were relatively close to a large number of entry-level jobs, while others were rather far, and competition for the few conveniently located jobs among many welfare clients made the transportation challenge much greater.
  • Tremendous variations existed within the Chicago metropolitan area regarding spatial competition for jobs.
  • Physical proximity to a job did not necessarily imply an increased opportunity for employment (i.e., if there are a large number of individuals in close proximity competing for the same job, there may be little benefit from physical proximity). In fact, the level of job accessibility in the Chicago central business district (at the time, close to 13 percent of all entry-level job openings) for welfare clients was lower than in many other areas in the region.
  • Job stability in terms of full-time or part-time employment, as well as the length of job retention, appeared to be related to access to private transportation.

Transportation and Environmental Justice

Federal mandates dictate that land use and transportation analyses in state departments of transportation (DOTs) and metropolitan planning organizations (MPOs) consider the three core principles of environmental justice: (1) to avoid, minimize, or mitigate disproportionately high and adverse human health and environmental effects, including social and economic effects, on minority populations and low-income populations; (2) to ensure the full and fair participation by all potentially affected communities in the transportation decision-making process; and (3) to prevent the denial of, reduction in, or significant delay in the receipt of benefits by minority and low-income populations.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading