Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Light rail transit (LRT) has emerged as a form of rail transit designed for trips inside a city and/or trips linking suburbs and the urban core. Light rail use has followed the rising costs associated with oil as a fuel source, postwar increases in automobile ownership and resultant congestion, and an increased premium placed on coordinating transit with other planning goals.

New LRT systems developed in the United States because of innovations made by local transit advocates and planning agencies, with inspiration taken from Northern European systems. Cities have chosen light rail as a less costly alternative to subways and in response to real estate interests or residents who want to promote less car-dependent neighborhoods. Often LRT planners seek gains from transit-oriented development or by linking transit and growth goals to support central business district (CBD) development.

Not all regions have been equally successful with LRT. Regions with the greatest success in attracting passengers and transit-related growth have made planning decisions to tie LRT to increasing urban density and have located light rail near transportation focal points. Studies comparing LRT to other transportation modes have noted LRT's advantages in speed, cost and sustainability, but some researchers have also taken issues with various claims.

Definition

LRT is a public transport system that uses steel-tracks on a fixed guideway, generally operating using exclusive rights of way and vehicles that can operate as multiple units coupled together or as single units. Sometimes LRT tracks can overlap with city streets, sharing traffic with cars and other vehicles. Light rail systems are usually at surface level, but they sometimes operate within systems with underground, or subway, stations and sections. For example, about 80 percent of Buffalo, New York's LRT system is underground.

Although heavy transit systems—popularly known as subways, metros, or undergrounds—generally have greater operating speeds than LRT systems, the LRT can save passengers time through reduced boarding and exiting times, and stations can be closer to destinations, leading to shorter commuting times. Planners must decide between having more stops, which provides better access to buildings and homes in dense downtown areas, or fewer stops, which decrease total commuting time for those living in outlying areas.

A variety of different specific technologies are being used by different LRTs around the world. In Portland, Oregon; and Boston, Massachusetts, a part of the system involves underground stations. In both Portland, Oregon; and Stockholm, Sweden; the light rail system interfaces with street traffic in some areas, even though each system primarily travels on a dedicated right-of-way separated from street traffic. In the United Kingdom, the Docklands Light Railway (DLR) in London is a fully automated system with cars powered by an electrified third rail, a power source usually used by traditional heavy rail systems.

The Rise and Fall of the Streetcar

In the Light Rail Developers' Handbook, Lewis Lesley compares light rail to streetcars and traces them back “to medieval mines in Europe, where beams of wood were laid longitudinally to make the haulage of wagons easier. These “traams” or wooden balks lent their name to tramways. Later, iron plates were used on the timber beams to increase life and give a smoother haul, and with the advent of iron rails and steam haulage came railways.”

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading