Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Serial Order Memory, Computational Perspectives

Serial recall requires people to accurately remember and recall the order of sequences of information such as letters, digits, and spatial locations over short periods of time. This task is of interest as one of a number of tasks used by both researchers and clinicians to tap short-term memory abilities; when combined with an interleaved processing task (e.g., a choice reaction time task), the combination is a good predictor of higher level cognitive abilities such as reasoning. Serial recall is especially popular given the specific focus on memory for the order of information and has been argued to be fundamentally involved in learning the phonology of new words. Reflecting this interest, a number of models of serial recall have been developed to account for serial recall performance. The theoretical development in this area has been impressive, with models accounting for a comprehensive set of data at a fine level of detail. The key phenomena accounted for by these models include primacy and recency, whereby memory accuracy declines across positions in the sequence with the exception that the last one or two items in a sequence are better remembered; the locality effect, whereby an item recalled in an incorrect position will nonetheless tend to be recalled in a nearby position; and the phonological similarity effect, where verbal materials that rhyme or share a number of phonemes will be less well recalled, particularly because of worse memory for the ordering of those materials in the sequence.

Representing Order

One basic issue addressed by these models is how the order of elements in a sequence is represented. Figure 1 shows three general schemes of representation of order in contemporary models of serial order. In the top scheme, chaining, adjacent elements of a sequence are associated in memory. Once an item is recalled, the following item can be accessed by using the recalled item to cue the next item via the pair association. Although Stephan Lewandowsky and Bennet Murdock showed that the chaining model could account for many of the key phenomena described above, later work has challenged this model. A particularly troublesome finding is that alternating rhyming and nonrhyming items in a sequence does not harm—and may even enhancerecall of the dissimilar items. Chaining models predict that confusions of rhyming items should be followed by confusions of nonrhyming items: When a rhyming item is recalled in the wrong position, the following nonrhyming item should move with it and thus be incorrectly ordered.

Figure 1 Schemes for representing order in memory

None

This led to the development of primacy gradient models, in which order is represented as a gradient of activation or encoding strength across items. These models successfully account for many of the key phenomena and can allow nonrhyming items to be protected from confusions between rhyming items by assuming that phonological confusions occur in a stage downstream from the primacy gradient. One challenge to these models is the effect of grouping on serial recall: Temporally grouping a sequence by placing pauses between subsequences produces primacy and recency within subsequences and also leads to specific patterns of confusions in between groups, the most telling of these being that elements that appear at the same position in different subsequences are more likely to be confused. These grouping effects imply some form of factorial or hierarchical representation in short-term memory, taking these data beyond the limits of the unidimensional, strength-based, primacy-gradient models.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading