Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Perceptual Constancy

Perception concerns the relationship between physical properties of the world and our conscious experience of them. One area of great interest to perceptual psychologists is perceptual constancy. Perceptual constancy concerns the degree to which a perception remains the same under varying conditions. Research in this area typically involves keeping some characteristic of a stimulus physically constant and asking observers to make judgments concerning that characteristic under varying contextual conditions. Researchers have studied color constancy as a function of illumination, color surround, chromatic adaptation to prolonged exposure to a color, and off-color objects known to have a specific color (such as an orange-colored cherry). Others have examined lightness constancy as a function of overall illumination, shadows, and brightness of the surround. Another area of interest is shape constancy where researchers have examined perceived shape as a function of object orientation and distance from the observer to the object. Others have looked at slant constancy as a function of object shape and configuration. Space is too limited to fully describe all aspects of perceptual constancy here, so this entry focuses in detail on the oldest and most thoroughly researched area of perceptual constancy research: size constancy.

Size Constancy

In the typical size constancy experiment, a comparison stimulus of adjustable size is located near the observer, and a standard stimulus of constant size is located at several distances from the observer. The observer's task is to adjust the comparison stimulus until its size matches each standard. As one would expect, observers accurately reproduce the standard when it is close to the observer (at the same distance away as the comparison). However, adjustments can become increasingly erroneous as the standard grows more distant from the observer.

If the observer accurately adjusts the near comparison to match the standard at all distances, the data are said to show constancy. On the other hand, if the observer sees distant standards as being smaller than they really are and adjusts the comparison to be physically smaller than the standard, the data are said to show underconstancy. Conversely, if distant standards dispose the observer to make the comparison too large, the data are said to show overconstancy.

Historical Review

Scholars have been interested in size constancy since ancient times. Euclid (c. 300 BCE), Ptolemy (2nd century CE), Plotinus (c. 300 CE), Ibn al-Haytham (c. 1030), René Descartes (1637), and Leonardo da Vinci (c. 1500) all described their observations concerning size constancy and offered explanations for the phenomenon.

Empirical work on size constancy began in earnest during the late 1920s. Egon Brunswik supervised much of this research and provided the first theoretical account for size constancy. Brunswik believed that size judgments reflect a compromise between an objective attitude, where the observer attempts to adjust the comparison to accurately reflect the physical size of the standard, and a subjective attitude, where the observer defines size as an artist would and attempts to adjust the comparison so that its visual angle matches the visual angle of the standard. Here, the visual angle refers to the percentage or proportion of the field of vision taken up by the standard, not its physical size.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading