Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Cognitive dissonance theory originally predicted that when an individual has in mind two or more elements of knowledge that are relevant to each other (and important) but inconsistent with one another, he or she will experience a state of psychological discomfort, which is referred to as dissonance. Lying to a friend is just one of many examples of a situation that might create dissonance. Thus, the theory is concerned with how perception and cognition influence and are influenced by motivation and emotion. Over the past 50 years, hundreds of experiments have tested dissonance processes, and research on the theory continues to this day. For the most part, these experiments have explored the ways that the experience of cognitive dissonance causes attitude and behavior changes, although the theory's reach is much broader. This entry reviews the original theory of cognitive dissonance and the experimental methods used to test it; discusses revisions to the original theory; and surveys recent research on neural circuits involved in dissonance processes, cultural differences in dissonance processes, neural network models, and nonhuman animal responses to dissonance.

The theory's long and continuing impact probably resulted for several reasons: The theory is stated abstractly, can be applied to a wide array of issues, and deals with the interaction of cognition, motivation, and affect. Moreover, the theory has generated research that suggested ways of inducing lasting attitude, belief, and behavior change. For example, dissonance research has demonstrated that dissonance processes can reduce prejudice, increase water conservation, increase the purchasing of condoms, reduce hunger and thirst, and reduce pain. In addition, dissonance processes can lead to changes in attitudes toward a variety of objects and issues, such as boring tasks, boring reading passages, delicious chocolate, eating grasshoppers, bitter beverages made with vinegar, increasing tuition at one's university, and mandatory comprehensive final exams.

The Original Theory of Cognitive Dissonance

In the mid-1950s, Leon Festinger proposed the theory of cognitive dissonance, which as mentioned above, states that an unpleasant state of psychological discomfort, dissonance, is created when an individual holds two or more elements of knowledge of some importance that are relevant to but inconsistent with one another.

According to the original theory, the degree of dissonance in relation to a particular cognition = D / D + C. In this formula, D is the sum of cognitions dissonant with a particular cognition and C is the sum of cognitions consonant with that same cognition. Also, in this formula, each cognition is weighted for importance.

Festinger theorized that the unpleasant state of dissonance motivates individuals to engage in cognitive work to reduce the inconsistency. This can be accomplished by adding consonant cognitions, subtracting dissonant cognitions, increasing the importance of consonant cognitions, or decreasing the importance of dissonant cognitions. Attitude change is one of the most often assessed ways of reducing dissonance. This attitude change is expected to be in the direction of the cognition that is most resistant to change. In experimental tests, researchers often assume that the knowledge about recent behavior is usually most resistant to change, because it is often very difficult to undo that behavior. This concept of resistance to change of cognition is vital to the theory and distinguishes dissonance theory from other theories concerned with similar processes. The concept, resistance to change, specifies which cognitions will likely be altered by the individual experiencing dissonance.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading