Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

This entry refers to a psychiatric and neurological state of mind, termed automatism, during which the person acts seemingly unaware of his actions, and examines the legal implications and consequences of these actions.

Automatisms are behaviors that happen outside conscious controls. Claims that an offender was not fully conscious at the time of the crime imply lack of cognitive scrutiny and will. Automatisms, along with acts committed by accident, under duress, compulsion, or threat, or from instinctively taking avoiding action, are not voluntary acts and are not punishable. The concept of free will as determinative of voluntary action is central to an understanding of automatism in law.

Automatisms result from medical conditions, external physical force, or serious emotional disturbances that may cause gaps of consciousness or interruptions in the thread of psychic life. During automatisms, a person may perform simple or complex actions, more or less uncoordinated, without being fully aware. Afterward, there may be confused memories or total amnesia for the episode. Acts that take place during an interruption in the psychic life of the individual qualify as automatisms. The use of automatism as a defense against a criminal indictment, although available in other latitudes, has been a concept mostly developed in the English-speaking world.

Habitual and mechanized acts that are repetitive and learned (gesturing, walking, riding a bike, driving, etc.) or “unconscious” acts in the psychoanalytic sense, such as Freudian slips, take place while the person is conscious; hence, memory for the event is preserved. These acts do not qualify as automatisms. However, deeply repressed materials may occasionally burst through in catathymic explosions, those uncontrollable emotional outbursts that are usually accompanied by dissociation. These acts qualify as automatisms.

Neurology and Psychiatry

A presumed association between epileptic seizures and violence was seminal to the development of case law on automatism. Offenders who commit a crime during an epileptic attack are usually found not criminally responsible. Automatisms are also observed in complex partial epileptic seizures characterized by motionless stare, interruptions of ongoing behaviors, stereotyped non-purposeful movements, and subsequent amnesia.

Dazed, semi-conscious victims of concussions may display automatisms. Other brain conditions also may lead to automatisms because the faster metabolic changes happen, either from normality or back toward normality, the more likely seizure is to occur.

Apart from automatisms observed in schizophrenia or during intoxications, three other conditions are associated with automatism in psychiatry:

  • Dissociations are coordinated physical acts undertaken while groups of mental processes or ideas are separated from the rest of the personality so that they assume an independent existence; thus, they are dissociated from the normal stream of consciousness. Dissociated acts escape the integrative activity of the mind and are common in hysterical neurosis, multiple personalities, autoscopy (the perception of self in the exterior environment) and in other out-of-body experiences, mystical phenomena, states of possession, voodoo, and experiences of mediums during séances in spiritualism.
  • Psychological blows are unexpected and sudden emotional shocks, on witnessing catastrophes or on receiving news, that seriously devastate emotional equanimity. A psychological blow defense presumes that any person, even one with intact personality structure and no history of mental problems, could be overcome and dissociate. Based on R. v. Rabey, courts apply an objective test for a psychological blow that measures the gravity and severity of the psychological trauma in a person with no history of mental or personality difficulties; absent this, courts will find for insane automatism, as in R. v. K.
  • Somnambulism is a state of dissociation in which, when the person sleeps, some fragment of the personality directs him into performing complicated acts, as asserted in R. v. Tolson. As determined in R. v. Parks, somnambulism is a “normal” form of automatism.

Law

Three factors lie at the intersection between medicine and law with regard to automatism as a

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading