Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Even when a person is alone, he or she is alone in the world of the other. In fact, a person can work very hard at finding private spaces, excluding others, and striking out on one's own for the purpose of engaging in activities that the person and/or others define as objectionable, offensive, or deviant in some way. Solitary deviance, therefore, refers to deviant behavior that individuals undertake in a community context, yet, at the same time, on a more individual basis. Solitary deviance stands relative to subcultural deviance. Whereas subcultural deviance is a group-based activity, at times associated with complex boundaries of membership, territories, practices, activities, and a shared and available history, solitary deviance is undertaken on a more isolated basis but may be much more related to subcultural activities than initially thought. For example, those who are members of drug use subcultures may find themselves isolated from other members on a voluntarily or involuntarily basis. Under such circumstances, deviant activities that were originally subculturally based may be continued on a more individualistic basis. This entry discusses the types and processes of solitary deviance as well as the vicarious deviant experiences.

Types of Solitary Deviance

Joel Best and David Luckenbill have suggested distinguishing between two types of solitary actors: loners and individual deviants. The distinction here is helpful for understanding the range of solitary deviant behavior.

Loners are those who have no regular association with others who engage in similar deviant activities and have no membership in related deviant subcultures. Therefore, even though a related deviant subculture may exist, the loner does not seek membership within the group. This does not speak to self-identity, however. Loners may develop rather complex self-identities that are organized around solitary deviant activities. Loners participate in deviant behaviors in relative isolation from other participants, but they do so in a larger community context. For example, someone engaged in embezzlement often does so in an organizational context and may develop a concept of self that is rather centrally organized around accomplishments as a successful thief. Embezzlers, as loners, also may come to identify themselves as occupying a position of superiority over the others who are the targets of their actions. Therefore, the success of some forms of deviance by loners depends on maintaining the secrecy of the deviant behavior.

Whereas the embezzler needs someone to embezzle, the individual deviant is the initiator of the deviant behavior as well as the target of the behavior. Individual deviants are those who can undertake deviant acts by themselves and direct the action to themselves. Deviant acts by individual deviants are victimless in the sense that no one other than the individual deviant himself or herself is involved. While one may argue that in cases of self-harm, the deviant and the victim are one and the same, the very idea of the individual deviant resists any traditional distinction between perpetrator and victim. Examples of individual deviants include self-mutilators, anorexics, bulimics, the homeless, the mentally ill, the depressed, and those who hold deviant worldviews (e.g., religious or political perspectives). While the deviance is individual, individual deviants can and do come together on the basis of their deviant involvements.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading