Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Infanticide

Infanticide is the intentional killing of an infant by a member of its species and is widespread in human and nonhuman animals. As such, a key to understanding infanticide is the determination of what is an infant. In most mammal populations, infants are defined as individuals that are not yet weaned. This definition is used for humans as well but variations in breast-feeding practices affect its application across cultures. In many hunter-gatherer groups, children are not weaned until they are 3 years of age or older, while in many postindustrial societies, children are weaned before or at 1 year. While the debate over the “natural” age for weaning, and therefore the end of infancy, is beyond the scope of this entry, the practices of Western societies in particular affect how we define and study the phenomenon of infanticide. The following sections present anthropological and sociological approaches to infanticide in an effort to provide a more inclusive definition of the term and better understanding of the behavior.

Anthropological Approaches to Infanticide

Anthropologists tend to consider the intentional killing of all children under the age of 4 to be infanticide, but they vary in their interpretations of the behavior and the contexts in which they apply it. Essentially, there are two approaches to infanticide taken by anthropologists. For the sake of simplicity, we will refer to them as “cultural” and “evolutionary” approaches. Anthropologists who employ cultural approaches tend to consider the immediate contexts surrounding infanticide and focus on the cultural implications, reactions, and practices related to the phenomenon. For example, in many cultures around the world, infanticide is common when a child is born deformed, the mother gives birth to twins, there is question about the paternity of the child, or the mother dies in childbirth. In these cases, infanticides are usually committed within cultural norms, by a family member (often the mother or father), and there are few or no social consequences for this action. Infanticidal practices that meet these criteria are relatively common across human cultures. According to the Human Relations Area Files, housed at Yale University, infanticide has been observed in 108 out of 258 cultures from every region of the world, and in most cases it involves one of the circumstances listed here.

Anthropologists who utilize evolutionary approaches to studying infanticide look beyond the cultural practices related to the phenomenon and focus on the effects infanticide has on the fitness of the individuals involved. To do this, researchers often employ a comparative approach, considering infanticide in other animals, particularly in other primates.

In 1974, Sarah Hrdy, a biological anthropologist, provided the first systematic observations of infanticide in another primate species and identified a potential causal factor for the behavior. Hrdy observed that male langurs (Presbytis spp.) committed infanticides when they could not be the fathers of the targets of their aggression. Hrdy also observed that females became sexually receptive shortly after their infants were killed, and they often mated with the infanticidal male. Hrdy's conclusion was that infanticide is a reproductive strategy employed by male langurs to increase mating opportunities and reduce competition for their offspring.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading