Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Control theory offers an approach to explaining deviant behavior that differs from that of traditional theories (i.e., strain, differential association, and labeling). Specifically, control theorists attempt to explain why people conform to the rules and norms of society, not why they deviate. The idea that deviant behavior is caused by a breakdown in informal social control is a dominant theme in the deviance literature. Not only do several variations of control theory exist, but elements of control can be found in other sociological theories as well. According to control theorists, all controls are social in the sense that they develop and are maintained through a process of social interaction. Furthermore, it is through a process of social interaction with primary social groups that social control originates and becomes strengthened. One of the greatest strengths offered by control theory is that the various control theories can be used to explain many types of deviance across all socioeconomic groups.

Early Control Theories

The origins of control theory can be traced back to the 17th-century Enlightenment philosopher Thomas Hobbes, who contended that humankind was innately deviant. He argued that we all have the propensity to engage in bad behavior, which is why people come together and form social contracts. Individuals agree to live according to certain rules, norms, and laws so that collectively we can enjoy the benefits of living in a society. These contracts help to keep us in line. The concept of informal control was also introduced by the French sociologist Émile Durkheim (1858–1917) in his theory of anomie. Durkheim defined anomie as the relative “normlessness” in society that occurs from the destruction of the fundamental bonds that unite individuals in a collective social order. When the bonds become weak, individuals are forced to solve problems on their own. Social solidarity is maintained by two factors: integration and regulation. Integration refers to a state of cohesion, and regulation denotes the controls that bind individuals to the norms and values of society.

Contemporary control theory grew out of the work of Clifford Shaw and Henry McKay of the Chicago school of criminology. According to their social disorganization theory, high rates of poverty, transiency, heterogeneity, and population density contribute to neighborhoods becoming disorganized. In disorganized communities, neighborhood residents are unable to recognize common goals and values and are incapable of working collectively to solve problems. As a consequence, the institutions responsible for informal social control (families, schools, and other neighborhood organizations) lose the ability to exercise control over their members, and deviance flourishes.

Reiss's Theory of Personal and Social Control

The first sociologist after Shaw and McKay to pick up on the idea of deviance resulting from a breakdown in controls was Albert Reiss, in 1951. Reiss argued that there are two types of controls: personal and social. Personal or internal control refers to the ability of an individual to resist meeting his or her needs in ways that conflict with society's norms and values. Individuals simply lack self-control over their own behavior. Social or external control refers to the ability of social institutions and groups to make rules and norms binding on the individual members. Deviance is a product of a breakdown in either type of control or both.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading