Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Control balance theory is a complex and integrated theory of crime and deviance developed by Charles R. Tittle. The theory seeks to explain crime and deviance by integrating dozens of variables from several crime theories, such as social control, social learning, rational choice, deterrence, and strain. Control balance theory considers crime and deviance as a complex and multifaceted issue and focuses on explanation of deviance through multiple perspectives (e.g., environmental, psychological, contextual, and physiological). The theory argues that deviance occurs due to control imbalances that exist in individuals and social entities (organizations, institutions). Crime and deviance result when actors attempt to maintain or gain control.

Tittle differentiates two types of control imbalance: control deficit and control surplus. A control deficit exists when a person has less control than he or she is subjected to. More clearly, the control to which a person is subjected consists of external controls applied to him or her by others. Additionally, the reaction he or she exercises against the external control is considered a response control. On the other hand, a control surplus exists when a person is able to exert more control than he or she is subjected to. According to control balance theory, existence of an imbalance (either deficit or surplus) between these two controls (control exercised by one related to a control to which he or she is subjected) initiates a causal chain of deviance and may lead to particular types of crimes. If there is a balance between these external and reaction controls, which is theoretically defined as conformity, the likelihood of deviance is much lower. Thus, a key factor in control balance theory is a control ratio.

Control Ratio

Francis T. Cullen and Robert Agnew provide a good example about specific control incidents between professors and college students that is helpful for understanding the control ratio. Imagine that a college student asked a question of a professor who then insulted and humiliated the student for doing so. According to control balance theory, on one hand, a student with a control deficit may fight back either by returning the insults or by physically assaulting the professor. Alternatively, the student may avoid confrontation and instead sabotage the professor and hamper the professor's class implicitly. A student with control surplus, on the other hand, will likely act in a different way. For example, he or she may seek to exert control over the professor by making a complaint to the administration about the professor's humiliating action or perhaps by enlisting the aid of powerful relatives in an effort to have the professor dismissed from the college. The existence of either a control deficit (low control ratio) or a control surplus (high control ratio) will lead to different types of deviance, either repressive or autonomous, unless the control ratio is balanced. In contrast to earlier indicated control ratios, either deficit or surplus, if the student accepts that the professor was right in his or her response to the question, then the student may choose to conform and will not likely engage in deviant behavior.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading