Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Interest in body modification has grown significantly over the past 40 years in the Western world. Body modification encompasses a wide array of bodily practices, including but not limited to tattooing, piercing, cutting, scarification, branding, subdermal implantation, stretching, binding, suspension or flesh hanging, and human-machine hybridization. The term has also been used to refer to practices such as surgical alteration (often those deemed “elective” or “cosmetic”), bodybuilding or sculpting (through the use of performance-enhancing substances, diets, and exercise regimes), and anorexia or fasting. Typically, body modification techniques inscribe and alter the body's surface; however, the latter two examples illustrate how, through the loss or gain of body mass, the body's exterior might be transformed from the inside out.

Deviance scholars are drawn to the topic for a variety of reasons. Most research explores body modification as a form of physical deviance, focusing on the violation of traditional corporal appearance, adornment, and maintenance norms. Research also examines how specific forms of body modification are adopted by and utilized within various subcultural groups. This work elucidates the impact that such practices have on the identities of individual subculturalists as well as the shared systems of meaning that subculturalists create around these varying practices. Additional research reveals how the mainstream media frame certain body modification techniques as healthy modes of beautification and others as harmful forms of self-mutilation. Finally, body modification has been studied as an expression of oppositional political and cultural beliefs and as transgressive erotic performance.

Whether deemed “extreme” (e.g., surgical genital modification), “mainstream” (e.g., ear lobe piercing), “personal,” or “political,” the key theme that unites each of these diverse practices is the intentional physical transformation of the flesh. This entry provides an overview of nontattoo forms of body modification. Specifically, it discusses various techniques of body modification, recent historical shifts in somatic conceptualizations, body modification as subcultural practice, and media representations of body modification and body modifiers.

Techniques of Body Modification

Techniques of body modification vary with regard to the instruments used, the placement on the body, and the desired effect (aesthetic or otherwise). According to Fakir Musafar, a well-known body modifier and the “father” of modern primitivism, body modification practices can be classified in several basic yet distinct ways. There are practices that incorporate fire and heat, such as branding, burning, and tanning. Certain practices center on deprivation, such as fasting and calorie restriction. Other practices involve penetration of some kind, including tattooing, piercing, cutting, and scarification. Another type involves expansion by way of stretching or pulling the flesh; sometimes the flesh is already pierced and then stretched to accommodate larger-gauge jewelry. Conversely, there are also practices that focus on the constriction of the flesh, such as corseting and binding. Additionally, certain techniques revolve around suspension by ropes, flesh hooks, body parts, and/or multiple piercings. Of course, there are also bionic modifications, meant to enhance the body's “natural” capabilities; some common examples include contact lenses and prosthetic limbs. New methods of body modification develop as new technologies emerge.

Historical Shifts in Somatic Conceptualizations

Sociological theorists of the body suggest that body modification practices challenge the Cartesian dualism of mind and matter. Modification techniques underscore the fact that bodies are simultaneously social objects and social agents. Bodies may also convey messages about our identities; they are outward expressions of who we are, and they define us in relation to others. Chris Shilling's term body projects neatly summarizes this point. He argues that in late modernity, humans have come to view the body as a project to be undertaken. Thus, people have become increasingly invested in the appearance and performance of their bodies as a way to establish, cultivate, and manage a coherent narrative of self. Within postmodern culture, one must engage in body projects to accomplish self-identity.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading