Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Anomie Theory

Sociologists have often looked at the social environment as a structural factor in the cause of deviance and crime. For example, those promoting anomie and strain theories of crime focus on the social system as a root cause of deviation. They suggest that while social order and stability are conducive to conformity, disorder and turbulence are conducive to deviance and crime. Social order occurs when communities are organized and integrated with an internal cohesion and integration among their members. Disruption of this social system weakens the integration among members and breaks down informal social control. Despite several differences, anomie and strain theories are interrelated in accounting for deviance. While anomie theory, initially developed by Émile Durkheim, seeks to answer why some societies or countries have high crime rates, strain theory focuses on the reasons of certain people choosing conformity compared with others or vice versa. Durkheim, a pioneering French sociologist, and Robert Merton, the American successor of this tradition, use the concept of anomie (lawlessness and alienation) to account for deviant behavior within society. For Durkheim, anomie refers to the condition when norms lose power to regulate individuals' behaviors. Anomie is the state of societal disintegration when there is a disjunction between valued cultural ends and legal societal means to reach those ends.

Durkheim's Anomie

Durkheim coined the term anomie to explain patterns and prevalence of suicide. He theorized that the major cause of anomie in society was the breakdown of the social systems. Durkheim, taking an evolutionary approach, argued that the breakdown of social systems occurs when social structure is in a process of transition. Thus, the condition of normlessness breaks down the social order that guides peoples' behaviors, which might result in suicide. In such a morally deregulated condition, individuals cannot integrate without social and moral signs to guide them. For Durkheim, anomie occurs usually after an abrupt social, economic, or political change within a given society. As he contends, such an abrupt change inevitably impairs the collective conscience of society with regard to norms and values. During this time of structural transition, individuals are not sure of the moral laws that constrain them. Durkheim's argument is that the loosening of the bonds between social values is the root source of social disorder. During social and economic changes in transition periods, existing norms and values are insufficient to regulate and organize life in the new form of society.

Durkheim indicated that crime plays a positive role in society through reaffirming bonds among the noncriminal population; for example, when crime strengthens collective conscience by the creation of boundaries for human behavior defined by imposing sanctions on deviants. Durkheim viewed crime as a normal functioning force behind social change, and it is, therefore, important in every society. His perspective on the source of anomie took a holistic approach and was based on three postulates of functional analysis that overlooked normal societies' mechanisms to explain social pathology. While Durkheim contends that the phenomenon of deviancy is as much of an aspect of society as conformity, Merton argues that society should have more social control over it. That is, crime is the form of social deviancy that makes the meaning of integrated and conformist society understandable for us.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading