Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

The feminization of public relations began in the 1980s when women became the majority of public relations practitioners. Corporations attracted women into public relations departments to satisfy government requirements of affirmative action to hire women and minorities. Recent figures from several studies suggest that women comprise 73% to 85% of the public relations workforce.

Despite advances, women are not wholly represented in the top ranks of public relations at those percentages. Several U.S. and international studies from the Public Relations Society of America (PRSA), the International Association of Business Communicators (IABC), and the U.S. Census demonstrate gender disparities because women represent slightly more than half of all managers. A number of factors contribute to why the number of women moving from specialist work to managerial work drops. Factors such as family obligations, stereotyping of feminine characteristics, and stigmas against technical work contribute to women's lowered representation in managerial ranks.

Feminization theory in public relations explains and predicts the relationship between gender and workplace outcomes. Individual women experience negative outcomes because of feminization, such as pay gap, slower advancement, and less professional development opportunities compared to men. The industry experiences negative outcomes because of feminization. Specifically, the reputation of public relations is devalued as a “soft” field rather than a savvy, evidence-driven practice, and public relations personnel fight a long-term battle getting a position within executive management.

The “Velvet Ghetto” and the “Feminine Fallacy”

The term Velvet Ghetto originated in a Business Week article in 1978, “PR: ‘The velvet ghetto’ of affirmative action.” The article accurately predicted that in 20 years, more than half of the public relations workforce would be women because these positions were available, nonthreatening, and noncompetitive for managerial positions. In response, the IABC Foundation commissioned a series of Velvet Ghetto investigations to determine the effects of the increasing number of women in the field. As lead investigator, Elizabeth L. Toth summarized the findings of the research in 1988: Women are more likely to see themselves as technicians than managers; women receive lower salaries than men; and all professions that shift from male to female dominance undergo a decrease in status and salary. This problem is known as the “feminine fallacy.” Public relations appears to be an open field to women, but women consistently experience gender-based discrimination in myriad ways.

Glass Ceiling Studies

Throughout the 1990s, the PRSA Foundation commissioned a team of researchers to explore practitioner salaries as well as their perceptions of job satisfaction, sexual harassment, and roles. Through a series of “Glass Ceiling” studies spanning nearly a decade, researchers concluded that women practitioners experience a glass ceiling in public relations. Women try to “do it all” by performing managerial activities and technical tasks for lower pay than men.

Liberal and Radical Feminist Strategies

In 2001, Larissa A. Grunig, Toth, and Linda Childers Hon compiled a comprehensive literature review on this issue in Women in Public Relations: How Gender Influences Practice. The essence of this review led to liberal feminist strategies that women should employ to change themselves— including learning to negotiate more, monitoring their behavior, seeking out mentors, returning to school for advanced degrees, getting accredited, and attending after-hours functions to “get ahead.”

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading