Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Courage

The Oxford English Dictionary, third edition, defines courage as “the heart as the seat of feeling, thought, etc.; spirit, mind, disposition, nature.” While the definition of the word courage has changed throughout history, the soldier’s experience in battle often revolves around or relates to the particular intrinsic feeling described by this definition. However, as soldiers' experience changed over the past few decades in American history, the concept of courage changed as well. Military tactics evolved to protect soldiers as much as possible, so that courage no longer has to be exemplified by the traditional depiction of a 19th-century soldier waving a regimental banner in front of his brigade as he is hit with enfilade fire. In addition, the opposite of courage, cowardice, is something that no solider would admit to during the War of Independence or the Civil War, for fear of others calling his manhood into question. In modern military practices, however, recognition of fear and the subsequent onset of courage is a common discourse among soldiers who share the commonality of battle experience. Courage is a feeling that propagates an action that is deemed as brave. Thus, the courage displayed by soldiers can be applied to the discussion of modern military strategy, tactics, and experience. This entry discusses views on the concept of courage throughout history and describes medals and awards bestowed in the United States to recognize acts of courage.

The History of Courage

Throughout U.S. history, men and women who served in conflicts overseas and at home, whether in victory or defeat, displayed the utmost examples of courage through their acts of bravery and honor. While one usually imagines courageous acts as that of a commander leading his troops over a trench or a private soldier rallying his unit around the flag, the majority of soldiers call on courage to withstand the fear of battle on a daily basis. How did soldiers have the courage to do such actions? First, one must look at the broader culture of society to understand how a particular generation views the concept of courage. Soldier motivation can be closely tied to why men and women risk their lives on the battlefield. Studies of the common solider correlate the degree to which a soldier believes in a “cause,” also known as ideology, to how strong his dedication is to follow orders in spite of fear. Second, many soldiers fought to display their manliness or manhood, which was a significant virtue in 19th-century society. If soldiers went to war to define their manhood, the solidification of this attribute is through committing courageous acts, just as the opposite reaction would be to retreat or desert. Finally, the leadership understands that while courage is necessary, asking soldiers to serve as cannon fodder demoralizes them, and they have thus modernized the tactics to keep up with the technology. Because early tactics did not allow for soldiers to take cover or reload under the protection of defenses, soldiers were forced to shed fear and doubt by pursuing the enemy. Since modern technology outweighed the tactics, the officers made adaptations to decrease the number of casualties and protect their soldiers by digging trenches and building fortifications, which was once viewed as cowardly. Therefore, the concept of courage is modified throughout a war based on the soldier’s lived experience and ability to withstand the imminent fear of death.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading