Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Work Team Effectiveness

Work teams are defined as interdependent collections of individuals who share responsibility for specific outcomes in their organizations. Two elements of this definition are worth emphasizing. First, interdependence indicates that team members depend on each other to do their work. Consider a basketball or softball team where each person depends on the others when trying to produce a win. Second, team members share responsibility for delivering a certain product or result to the organization or larger social system within which they operate. These two elements of how teams function are important to keep in mind when considering theories of team effectiveness. Theories of team effectiveness address the definition of effectiveness, seek to identify factors that predict it, and explain how those factors operate. Examples include early models of team performance offered by Joseph E. McGrath as well as later ones focused on effectiveness, such as those offered by Susan G. Cohen and Diane E. Bailey, Steve W. J. Kozlowski, John E. Mathieu, Eric D. Sundstrom, and others. Team effectiveness should be conceptualized as part of a multilevel system with individual-, team-, and organizational-level factors and that requires special attention to the context within which teams perform their tasks. Team contexts are multifaceted and this, among other challenges, has prevented research on teams from being readily and consistently applied to real organizational situations. In the following section, a history of team effectiveness is briefly considered. Next, different approaches to team effectiveness are discussed and suggestions are made regarding which approaches are most relevant. Finally, a discussion of the validity and impact of the most relevant approaches to team effectiveness is provided.

Fundamentals

The application of work teams is centuries old. However, the documentation of their application in book chapters and research articles often begins with the Hawthorne studies conducted in the 1920s and 1930s, which included a series of empirical investigations of factors related to group outcomes. During this time period, however, the vast majority of organizational work was still performed by individual employees. The exceptions were primarily from military and manufacturing environments (i.e., cockpit and tank crews and informal automobile assembly teams). After the Hawthorne studies, the majority of interest in work teams was expressed by researchers rather than managers. In other words, the rate of research increased, whereas the application of work teams did not. Much of the early research involving work teams was performed by psychologists. Industrial/organizational psychologists followed their colleagues in social psychology by studying teams in organizational settings as opposed to the laboratory. While there was a significant amount of research being conducted through the 1950s, the application of teams did not become popular until the 1980s.

The increased interest from organizations for implementing work teams can be linked to the advent of total quality management (TQM). Organizations such as Ford Motor Company, Lockheed-Martin, and Motorola began experimenting with multiple types of teams. First, quality circles were attempted, and then some companies started performing production, project, and service work with teams. Many organizations realized the benefits of team-based approaches by achieving increases in productivity, efficiency, and quality. For other organizations that failed to implement appropriate support mechanisms, the benefit of teams fell far short of their promise. This, however, did not deter a number of companies from experimenting with team-based structures. The implementation of teams to perform a variety of tasks became commonplace in the 1990s. Kodak (customer service teams), Chevron (interfunctional teams), Dow Corning (self-managed teams within a unionized context), Motorola (self-managed teams within a nonunionized context), and Miller Brewing Company (cross-functional teams) are just a few examples of the application of teams within organizations. Today, the pursuit of effective teams is ubiquitous across continents, industries, and organizations.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading