Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Participative Model of Decision Making

A participative model of decision making takes into consideration that various situational forces influence, to some degree, the type of participatory approach managers should select during decision-making efforts. To this end, this entry first presents the seminal framework of Victor Vroom, Philip Yetton, and Arthur Jago, which offers a normative decision model (NDM)—or “decision tree”—to guide managers in systematically examining the structure of a decision context, assessing a defined set of criteria and relevant contingencies, and subsequently adopting the appropriate degree of participation in their decision-making style. Second, the entry presents Laurie K. Lewis and Travis L. Russ’s model focusing on participation during planned change efforts. The model incorporates dimensions that may influence managers’ choices as well as different approaches for facilitating varying degrees of stakeholder participation. Implications for contemporary management practices are discussed.

Fundamentals

Following the tradition of preceding situational leadership models, NDM can help leaders choose the most appropriate approaches for facilitating decision-making processes. The central premise of NDM is that the best approach for making organizational decisions is contingent on a number of situational factors, including quality, commitment of group or organization members, and time restrictions. NDM also argues that different decision-making situations require different leadership styles. NDM highlights five potential leadership styles and arranges them along a continuum, ranging from autocratic to consultative to group. Advancing a decision tree-type framework, NDM provides a systematic formula for identifying the most appropriate style that leaders can use when determining the degree to which they should involve subordinates in decision-making processes.

Yes or No Questions

NDM advances a series of seven questions to help leaders determine to what degree they might involve subordinates in decision-making processes. These questions are designed to be answered with either “yes” or “no” responses, creating a decision tree-type framework for determining the most appropriate decision-making style for a particular situation. The following highlights the eight assessment questions:

  • Is it absolutely critical that the “right” (or high-quality) decision is made? In other words, are the consequences of a “wrong” (or low-quality) decision significant?
  • Is it critical that subordinates are committed to the decision?
  • Do you (the leader) possess adequate information to make a high-quality decision on your own?
  • Is the problem structured in a way that the key issues and potential solutions are clear?
  • If you (the leader) made the decision independently, is it likely that your subordinates would be committed to the decision?
  • Do subordinates share the organizational goals to be obtained vis-à-vis the decision-making process?
  • Is it probable that conflict will emerge among subordinates when identifying the right decision?
  • Do subordinates possess adequate information to make a high-quality decision?

Decision-Making Styles

NDM advances a systematic decision tree-type framework for using the answers to the preceding yes or no questions to determine which style leaders should use in specific decision-making situations. NDM distinguishes five types of decision-making approaches organized into three styles, ranging from autocratic to consultative to group. Generally, an autocratic decision-making style is most appropriate when the leader possesses greater expertise about the problem than others, acting alone is not expected to cause any adverse consequences, subordinates will likely embrace the proposed solution, and there is little time to make a decision. Conversely, a consultative or collaborative style is generally appropriate when additional information is needed to make a decision, the structure of the problem is unclear, subordinate commitment is vital, and the leader has time to facilitate a participative decision-making process. The following describes NDM’s decision-making styles in more detail.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading