Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Humanistic Management

Humanistic management is a philosophy of management that emphasizes the interests of the employee in the manager-employee partnership. It is inclusive of a number of more specific theories that place a high value on human growth, potential, and dignity. In fact, humanistic managers don’t restrict fair and respectful treatment to employees alone, but rather, they accord this treatment to other stakeholders, such as customers, clients, vendors, and other members of the organizational community as well. They tend to maintain awareness of all organizational stakeholders rather than solely or mainly the shareholders or themselves at the expense of other stakeholders. Humanistic managers care how they accomplish organizational goals. They favor ethical codes for their organizations and pursue policies of global corporate social responsibility, including ensuring the human dignity of their workers in undeveloped countries and protecting the global environment. They work to ensure organizational and interpersonal justice for and among their stakeholders as well. Generally, they seek to belong or attend to professional and global associations with developed standards supporting and upholding human dignity, such as Social Accountability 8000 (SA8000), Fairtrade International, International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 26000, Corporate Accountability International, and others.

They endorse principles of sustainability, such as those promoted by groups like Forestethics or the UN Principles for Responsible Investment (PRI) and Global Compact initiatives. They welcome triple bottom-line reporting of some sort, in reference to the organization’s value to stakeholders (people), the global natural environment (planet), and to society at large (profit to society in the sense of economic output exceeds economic input resulting in overall benefit to society). Thus, humanistic management’s central insight is that all stakeholders—employees, customers, clients, shareholders, vendors, local and global communities—need to be treated with dignity and sensitivity if economic and environmental sustainability is to exist. However, it is difficult for a manager to operate humanistically unless the entire organization promotes a culture of humanism and organizational learning. This entry is focused on describing the fundamental principles of humanistic management, tracing its origins and the various theories associated with it, and examining its probable future as a management theory for widespread use in the 21st century.

Fundamentals

Humanistic management had its beginnings as a reaction to pre-20th-century management beliefs that one should manage by telling people what to do, monitoring them closely, and punishing them for nonperformance. At its worst, it was not very far removed from the slave labor of the 19th century— conditions could be physically abominable, and workers could be young children or women working 14-hour days at difficult, dehumanized tasks. The more enlightened managers of the day believed they could get the work they wanted from their workers if their messages were phrased properly; however, if they didn’t get what they wanted, they were justified in dismissing them. Workers in America thought they had few rights in this situation, and the ones who were immigrants, legal or illegal, English-speaking or not, simply felt that if they wanted to keep their jobs, they should keep quiet and do the best they could. Meanwhile, the father of “modern management,” Fredrick Taylor, wrote a book in 1911 titled The Principles of Scientific Management, in which he demonstrated through examples and pictures that there was a right way and wrong way to do any physical labor. There was no room for individual differences or considerations among the workers in this view. By timing people and measuring their output, Taylor and other “efficiency experts,” like Frank and Lillian Gilbreth, charted and described standardized ways to maximize physical work. Soon afterward, garment workers from New York City and assembly-line workers from Michigan began forming unions and demanding better conditions, better pay, better treatment, and some kind of due process to address perceived grievances.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading