Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

High-Performing Teams

The ability to work well in teams is undeniably essential in present-day organizations. Across a wide range of organizations, teamwork provides the competitive edge that translates opportunities into successes. High-performing teams are crucial for the effectiveness of organizations, not the least because well-aligned team thinking and goal orientation facilitates dealing with current crises and designing long-term strategies. Yet leaders and scholars too easily overlook the reality that, for most teams, it can be very difficult to generate remarkable synergy and excellent outcomes; instead, many teams become mired in endlessly unproductive sessions and are rife with conflict. Given the importance of teamwork, why do so many teams fail to live up to their promise? The answer lies in the obstinate belief that human beings are purely rational entities. Many team designers or others in positions of leadership fail to appreciate the real complexity of teamwork. They forget—out of denial or simple naïveté—to take into account the subtle, out-of-awareness behavior patterns underlying human interactions, at the interpersonal as well as intrapersonal levels. In other words, individual idiosyncrasies and group dynamics can derail effective team performance if these forces are not examined and, if necessary, addressed. This entry describes the core premises of the clinical approach to individual, team, and organizational studies. The authors then suggest how this paradigm can be applied practically and to great effect within the context of leadership group coaching toward the development of high-performing teams.

Fundamentals

At their best, high-performing teams have a source of collective energy and synergy which allows them to accomplish their goals with great efficiency and effectiveness. Team members possess a shared sense of purpose; they all pull in the same direction at the same time while taking advantage of complementarities in skills and competencies. In such teams, goals and objectives have been discussed and agreed on openly, so each member of the team pursues the same thing. Such teams stick together through highs and lows, taking both the blame and the rewards as something to be shared by all. The team is a source of pride to its members, who derive great pleasure and satisfaction from working together.

Dysfunctional teams, by contrast, are rife with role conflict and ambiguity, unresolved overt and covert conflicts, poor timekeeping and absenteeism. Teams that cannot reach closure have rigid, ritualistic meetings; uneven member participation; tunnel vision; indifference to the interests of the organization as a whole; and a lack of resources, skills, knowledge, and accountability. Within such teams, there is no genuine collegiality, collaboration, or coordination.

In many dysfunctional teams, blaming and scape-goating are some of the major dynamics stalling the organization’s productivity and creative process. In these teams, members avoid dealing with conflict, preferring to resort to veiled discussions and guarded comments. Taken to the extreme, such teams become toxic and morph into highly constipated, slow decision-making bodies, underperforming and floundering despite all the resources made available to them. Competitive feelings among team members can result in sabotage of each other’s work, unjustified criticism, and withholding of information and resources, contributing to the breakdown of the team’s proper functioning. All these dynamics can be very subtle, but they can be very damaging to the organization and its members.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading