Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Functions of the Executive

Chester Barnard’s management theory can best be defined as focused on managing individuals in organizations rather on than managing organizations. His theory begins with the psychological need of individuals to meet their goals and aspirations (large and small), their recognition of the inability to meet their goals by their own actions alone, and thus, the necessity to cooperate with others in order to function as they wish. His theoretical contributions are marked by his connecting these assumptions to the formation of organizations and the role of leaders in managing human organizations. Barnard’s work has remained significant for nearly a century, during which time scholars and leaders have studied and navigated organizational shifts around the globe. Barnard’s Functions of the Executive, published in 1938, is remarkable for its comprehensiveness and depth. He details ways in which the human need for association, grounded in biological and physical limitations, expresses itself in cooperative efforts; the dynamics of authority and power and under what conditions individuals follow direction from supervisors without questioning; the prime role of interpersonal and organizational communication; the influence of informal groups; the definition and role of morals in executive leadership and organizational purpose. Clearly, Barnard’s work, written during times of turbulence and change in American society, has strong applicability to the relentless global changes of the 21st century. This entry focuses attention on three fundamental factors of Barnard’s theory: (a) basic need of individuals for association to meet their goals and aspirations, (b) communication and human interaction, and (c) authority. Following the explication of these key factors, the importance of Barnard’s theory is presented.

Fundamentals

The continued relevance of Barnard’s work is grounded in the fact that he begins with the individual as his unit of analysis and then builds his theory of organizations around that framework. For Barnard, everything—including authority—starts with the individual at the bottom level rather than at an upper hierarchical level.

Barnard’s analysis is inclusive, a brilliant, consistent work that crafts an organizational and societal system based on the needs of individuals. He is often associated with Elton Mayo and others in the human relations movement, which stresses attention to the needs of individuals and groups in the workings and effectiveness of organizations. Barnard’s work clearly resonates with Mayo’s thinking. However,

Barnard’s view of organizations was not based in an existing theory. As a keen observer of people in multiple settings and situations, his conceptualizations emerged from his vast and multifaceted experience dealing with people engaged in organizational/organized settings. These diverse settings represented a variety of institutional purposes from corporate profit to national security to relief to citizens hardest hit by the Great Depression. These direct experiences provided key data that informed Barnard’s thinking.

Basic Need of Individuals for Association

Barnard’s entire theoretical structure is based in understanding human beings as purposeful individuals with aspirations to improve their situations. Individuals have needs and goals that they cannot fulfill by themselves; human biological and physical limitations prevent them from doing as they would like. While these restrictions curb choices, choices are expanded through cooperation with others to meet desired ends.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading