Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Competitive Advantage

The primary objective of a firm’s strategy is to identify, create, and sustain a competitive advantage over its industry rivals. A firm is said to possess a competitive advantage if it outperforms its industry rivals over a sustained period of time. Although the scholarly roots of a hypothetical theory of competitive advantage are dispersed across a fragmented management literature, it can be inarguably stated that the primary roots lie in Michael Porter’s seminal work on the strategic management of firms—often informally referred to as Porter’s theory of competitive advantage. Accordingly, a firm’s strategy should identify a unique strategic position within its industry so as to reduce or counter the profit-reducing effect of the competitive forces in that industry. The entry is organized as follows. The next section is focused on the fundamentals of this theory as laid out in Porter’s seminal work that provides both frameworks to explain various position-based advantages and prescriptions to achieve and sustain the same. The subsequent section is focused on other developments in the management literature that either were triggered as systematic efforts to provide an alternate explanation for the competitive advantage of firms or extend the concept of competitive advantage to other contexts (e.g., multibusiness firms). This section also shows the conceptual gaps that need to be addressed in order to develop a comprehensive theory of competitive advantage. The final section is a combination of arguments that articulate the internal—and external— environmental perspective on competitive advantage to provide an explanation of how firms create and sustain competitive advantage.

Fundamentals

While the concept of competitive advantage may have originated in the prescriptive literature, its ascendancy as a preeminent theoretical construct is firmly rooted in an interdisciplinary descriptive literature. The prescriptive literature primarily focuses on explaining (to the CEOs) how to create and preserve competitive advantage (to maximize shareholder returns). On the other hand, the descriptive literature focuses on exploring the causality issues from a scholarly perspective. However, a consensus eludes both streams concerning not only the measure of firm performance that reveals competitive advantage but also the factors that contribute to the creation and sustainability of firms’ competitive advantage.

Porter’s pioneering work in the late 1970s and early 1980s generated both theoretical and prescriptive frameworks to explain the pervasive yet consensus-eluding concept of competitive advantage. In his scholarly articles published in various academic journals, he explains what is now referred to as the positioning-based advantages of firms, and provides the intellectual foundations for a robust field of scholarly inquiry. Porter’s best-selling books, Competitive Strategy in 1980 and Competitive Advantage in 1985, provided not only the intellectual foundations for his theory of competitive advantage but also bridged the divide between the prescriptive and descriptive literature.

Five Forces

Porter’s Competitive Strategy provides a framework to identify the basis of competitive advantage in a firm’s proximate industry environment—referred to as Porter’s five forces of competition model. The model predicts the average profitability of an industry in terms of three horizontal and two vertical forces of competition that together determine the structural attractiveness of the focal industry. Basically, the industry structure determines the extent to which the value created by a firm for its customers is competed away (in an unattractive structure) or appropriated by the firm (in an attractive structure). The three horizontal forces of competition that negatively influence industry profitability include the threat of new entrants, interfirm rivalry, and the threat of substitutes. The two vertical forces of competition include the bargaining power of suppliers and buyers. A firm’s strategy—informed by an ex-ante analysis of its industry structure—should aim (a) at the very least to cope with these competitive forces, or (b) preferably to counter their negative effects on profitability but (c) ideally to exploit the attractive features of the industrial market.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading