Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

The term workplace control refers to attempts by managers to get workers to do what is required to meet the organization’s goals. This entry discusses some direct and indirect uses of humor that have been documented over the years to control workers.

A workplace, unlike most other places, has both a common purpose and an authority structure to keep the energy focused on that purpose. For this reason, workplace humor could be classified into three broad categories: (1) humor that tends to support the purpose; (2) humor that tends to thwart that purpose; and (3) humor, usually silly, that has nothing to do with that purpose.

Humor that resists the purpose of the organization or that resists attempts by management to push for the organization’s purpose is usually characterized as resistance, while silly humor, which is irrelevant to the purpose of the organization, is usually characterized as comic relief. Humor that supports the purpose of the organization, either directly or indirectly, has received less attention.

Direct Worker Control

The idea of using humor for any kind of control is usually traced to the early superiority theories of Aristotle and Thomas Hobbes. For example, Richard

Stephenson argues that sarcasm, caricature, or parody can be used to ridicule deviant behavior and thus discourage people from repeating it. Humor can be used to tease people who violate social or other norms and encourage them to get back in line. Using humor this way in the workplace might be called direct workplace control. This is different from the more indirect method of using humor to vent resistance so that it does not become dangerous.

In an article based on her 1957 doctoral thesis in cultural anthropology, Pamela Bradney described the efforts of clerks in a London department store to tease trainees who demonstrated deviant behaviors. In this way, they brought new employees in line with the norms and expectations of the workplace. Since then, similar work has shown that humor can be used to gently correct the behaviors of those in machine shops and restaurant kitchens.

Another way that humor is used to control people is by the cultural rules about who is authorized to joke with whom. Anthropologist Alfred Radcliffe-Brown (1881–1955) has written that we can learn about levels of authority and respect by noting who jokes with whom. In a recent era, it was de rigueur for male comedians to make fun of their mothers-in-law, for example. Studies of this phenomenon have shown how mental health workers show deference to psychiatrists and similar power relationships. For a managers, though, this presents an opportunity to demonstrate respect (or lack thereof) through their willingness to joke with or about others.

Of course, this sort of chiding humor can be a diversionary tactic to hide aggressive messages that would be unacceptable if expressed directly. When this happens, the attempt at worker control often backfires. The manager who is seen as backbiting gains neither power nor respect. Also, there is a very different way to use humor in support of the organization and its goals.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading