Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Translation is an extremely broad and far-reaching notion that first and foremost refers to what Roman Jakobson famously labeled interlingual translation, namely the transfer of a message from one language to another (e.g., English into Arabic, Spanish into Russian, Chinese into Italian, etc.). Translating humor between languages is notoriously considered to be a particularly difficult task.

The role of script opposition, an aspect of the general theory of verbal humor (GTVH) proposed by Salvatore Attardo and Victor Raskin (1991), is an essential element of verbal humor. According to this theory, instances of verbal humor such as jokes, gags, and witticisms are composed of two overlapping scripts, one of which is concealed while simultaneously overlapping another more hidden script in a watertight manner. Concurrently, however, these two coinciding scripts also oppose each other in such a way as to create a humorous incongruity. A basic canned joke such as

Q: “What invention made it possible for humans to walk through walls?”

A: “The door.”

contains two scripts, one that leads the recipient to imagine an invention that would allow people to literally walk through solid walls and a second, more straightforward, albeit “hidden” script that refers to the everyday object that allows us to move between the different parts of a building separated by walls, namely doors. Such a joke presents no particular problems in terms of translation because, while playing upon the indistinctness of the preposition “through” collocated with the concept of “crossing walls” and thus conjuring up a literal as well as a more commonsensical script, most modern languages possess similar notions regarding walls and how to overcome them through the use of doors, as can be seen by the Spanish and German translations:

P: “¿Cuál fue el invento que permitió a los seres humanos atravesar las paredes?”

R: “La puerta.”

F: “Dank welcher Erfindung können Menschen durch Wände laufen?”

A: “Türen.”

While Spanish and German are very different languages in formal terms, both translations closely mirror the original English witticism in both form and content. Furthermore, the script opposition remains identical in both languages. Translational problems arise when verbal humor is either extremely language specific, extremely culture specific, or, as is often the case, a combination of lingua-cultural specificity.

Equivalence and (Un)translatability

The translation of humor challenges two major principles of translation theory that have been greatly debated over the centuries, namely those of equivalence and translatability. Due to the very nature of languages, which are all different from one another in terms of, for example, diverse words, unlike syntactic structures, grammatical systems, and so on, formal equivalence in translation is virtually impossible to achieve. Similarly, the notion of translatability, which refers to the transfer of meaning from one language to another without suffering major changes with respect to the source text, is especially hard to sustain in the case of humor, owing to factors pertaining to lingua-cultural divergence. Yet verbal humor is translated—suffice it to think of the verbal dexterity of writers such as William Shakespeare, Giovanni Boccaccio, and James Joyce and comedians like the Marx Brothers and Woody Allen, all of whom have been successfully translated into dozens of languages. However, many such translations are quite different from the original texts. In fact, what is actually meant by (un)translatability in the case of humor are the radical changes that a text has to undergo from one language to another, changes that often involve the forgoing of formal equivalence in exchange for dynamic equivalence. Dynamic equivalence refers to a type of correspondence that sets out to produce an effect on the target reader that is similar to the effect caused by the source text on the source reader even if this means forgoing formal likeness. Thus, in the case of humorous texts, dynamic equivalence is the means by which a humorous effect can be achieved even though the translation may involve drastic departures from the source text in order to justify a positive humor response in the recipient.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading