Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

In everyday language, the word maxim refers to a rule of conduct adopted by an individual to get on in life (e.g., “Trust your crazy ideas!”), or it is used as a synonym for aphorism, a general truth expressed in a laconic form (e.g., François de La Rochefoucauld’s maxims). Theoretically, in the seminal framework developed by the philosopher Herbert Paul Grice (1913–1988), maxims are understood to be basic assumptions of rational conversation mutually shared by the participants. Grice subsumes his maxims under a cooperative principle (“Make your conversational contribution such as is required”) and four categories borrowed from Immanuel Kant. They are cornerstones of bona fide communication, and, thus, their opposites might be regarded as containing the recipe for humorous conversation.

Grice’s work has attracted enormous interest. Relativists have questioned the universality of the maxims, reductionists have tried to reformulate and eliminate them, whereas expansionists have introduced further maxims to capture various aspects of language use. Humor theorists have discovered their explanatory power and offer ways the Gricean framework can tackle or can be accommodated to humorous material such as jokes. This entry discusses how Grice’s maxims and a subsequent list of politeness maxims postulated by linguistics professor Geoffrey N. Leech account for some humor.

Maxims of Cooperation and Politeness

Despite the widespread criticism of his model, most textbooks and studies that discuss Grice’s maxims use the original version that Grice developed and ignore the maxims that others added later.

Quantity

Make your contribution as informative as is required.

Do not make your contribution more informative than is required.

Quality

Do not say what you believe to be false.

Do not say that for which you lack adequate evidence.

Relation/Relevance

Be relevant.

Manner

Be perspicuous:

  • Avoid obscurity of expression.
  • Avoid ambiguity.
  • Be brief.
  • Be orderly. (Grice, 1975)

A set of politeness maxims that account for a broader range of humor phenomena was postulated by Leech:

Tact

Minimize cost to other.

Maximize benefit to other.

Generosity

Minimize benefit to self. Maximize cost to self.

Approbation

Minimize dispraise of other.

Maximize praise of other.

Modesty

Minimize praise of self.

Maximize dispraise of self.

Agreement

Minimize disagreement between self and other.

Maximize agreement between self and other.

Sympathy

Minimize antipathy between self and other.

Maximize sympathy between self and other. (Leech, 1983)

Everyone occasionally behaves in ways that are inconsistent with (fail to fulfill, violate, infringe) one or more of these maxims. Grice describes four types of such instances: (1) unostentatious violation (e.g., misleading), (2) opting out (when the speaker indicates that he or she cannot obey the maxims for some reasons), (3) clashing (when the speaker is unable to fulfill a maxim without violating another), and (4) flouting (when a patent violation of a maxim urges the hearer to discover an implicit meaning conveyed by the speaker). Hyperbole and irony flout the first quality maxim, according to Grice.

Leech argues that the relationships between illocutionary goals and social goals can be competitive, convivial, collaborative, or conflictive. These four situations are parallel to the possible relationships between Grice’s and Leech’s maxims. Conflictive situations are greatly sensitive to humor. Clashes between Gricean and Leechian maxims may be humorous.

People sometimes fail to follow the maxims unintentionally. Non-native speakers, for example, may not always be aware of the different meanings and the socially adequate use of words they employ. Helen Spencer-Oatey recalls a case when she, in her early 50s, helped a foreign student of low proficiency in English find his way across London. On reaching the train, the young man tried to express his gratitude by saying, “Thank you very much. You are a very kind old lady,” a quite paradoxical “compliment” (according to the approbation maxims) to which she reacted, understandably, with mixed emotions. Public notices posted to inform an international audience are common sources of ambiguity, such as the following advertisement for donkey rides somewhere outside the English-speaking countries: “Would you like to ride on your own ass?” Ambiguous statements accidentally made by politicians quickly become widely known via traditional media and Internet folklore.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading