Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Genres and Styles of Comedy

Although an imprecise and contested term, genre is an important tool in the study of humor and comedy. One traditional function of literary criticism in the 1960s and 1970s was to pin down definitions of different categories of styles and modes in works, identifying literary and non-literary genres. At its best, this made sense of complex critical terminology for the intelligent reader and was not undertaken pedantically. In the 1980s, genre became a tool for the linguistic analysis of popular texts and, as Vijay Bhatia (2012, p. 17) records, even products of professional practice such as the business prospectus and instructional manual. But the concept of genre itself became politicized, subject to the charge of mandatory and exclusionary labeling. Scholars like Bernadette Casey point out that saying that a particular play for example is not “a proper” tragedy tends to impose a single dominant interpretation on a piece of work and to exclude alternative readings and interpretations (B. Casey, N. Casey, Lewis, Calvert, & French, 1993, p. 312). Genre classification certainly rests on expert knowledge of a field. After a period of being frowned on as politically incorrect, it is fortunately once again permitted (if somewhat grudgingly). Self-evidently, clarity of usage facilitates progress in any field of endeavor, including humor studies. This entry discusses how genres are defined, detail some comic genres, and discuss the difference between comic genres and comic styles.

Problems of Generic Definitions

The word genre derives from the French genre, meaning a kind or a type, and has traditionally been applied to art, literature, and drama. There is often a lack of consensus about precise definitions of individual genre, even about the basis on which to define them. Some critics argue for the importance of form, others for content, treatment (or style), or perhaps a combination of all three. Agreement seems more easily reached in the case of short genres with strongly defined formal characteristics, such as the English 14-line sonnet or the Japanese haiku (serious) and senryū (comic), both strictly regulated poetic forms with a precise number of syllables.

Besides defining a genre in terms of its form, content, and overall treatment style, general family resemblances between works are used. This approach is based on the psycholinguistic concept of prototypicality and employs the shared features of a few texts commonly regarded as being more typical members of a genre than others to “identify the extent to which an exemplar is prototypical of a particular genre” (Swales, 1990, p. 52). Amid all this complexity, the safest and most commonsense approach to genre concepts is to treat them with caution, as fuzzy, not watertight, categories. Even if genres cannot always be defined by necessary and sufficient conditions, they nevertheless serve as useful markers of aspects shared by like works and of what a particular text (or a performance) seems intended to elicit in its readers (and audience).

Comedy and Genre

Generic categorization in theater comedy has been driven not only by critics but by audiences, who like to know what they may expect on stage. Comedy (e.g., as opposed to tragedy) can itself be considered a genre; but its principal subcategories—such as comedy of manners, romantic comedy, farce, and tragicomedy—are often also termed genres rather than subgenres. Importantly, these themselves do not always remain precise and frequently shade into and combine with each other; each also embraces its own subforms. Criteria used in naming genres have included form, content, style, purpose, even time and place of performance. For example, two types of farce are the English 18th-century “afterpiece,” forming a short conclusion to a long evening's mixed theatrical bill of fare, and the German late medieval Fastnachtspiel, a brief farce staged on Fastnacht (Shrove Tuesday) at the beginning of the Lenten period of fasting and reflection. Both were short plays, dependent on trickery and deception, favoring physical comedy over verbal wit and making good use of stock character types. They also shared the same dramatic purpose: to entertain in a light-hearted and carnivalesque way without seeking to critique the society that produced and enjoyed them. Although both clearly belong to the genre of farce, dramatic criticism recognizes each one as a different comic genre, named and defined by its circumstances of performance.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading