Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Factor Analysis of Humor Items

Factor analysis of humor items is used to derive new concepts (i.e., identify “functional units,” or components of humor) in a yet unexplored domain and to purify scales (i.e., identify items that do not measure the construct very well and need reformulating or eliminating). The purpose of the former is to provide a new structure to a field by deriving single concepts, or an entire model of humor; the purpose of the latter is to improve an existing humor scale. Humor items that have much in common will load on the same factor, that is, will be markers of a component (for example, “I enjoy joking around with others” and “I use humor to foster group morale” can be markers of social aspects of humor use). Factor analysis is applied to the intercorrelation of items and the analysis then helps determine the number and nature of factors (latent constructs, in this case “types of humor”) that are needed to statistically explain humor. This method can be applied to items, such as behaviors, statements, stimuli, for example, but also humor scales. In both cases, the aim is to derive a structural model of humor (e.g., a taxonomy of jokes, styles of everyday humor behaviors, components of the sense of humor). Finding the factors (or components of humor) and labeling them is the first of several steps. Further steps are replicating the factors by substituting humor items or using new samples, also in different countries, and looking at causes (genetics, environment), correlates, and consequences (health, workplace behaviors, etc.) of these humor factors. This entry discusses the methodological considerations of factor analysis of humor items, reviews factor analytic studies of humor items, and considers the need for further research to determine additional humor factors.

Methodological Considerations

In general, the success of such studies depends on how representative the sampled humor items are. Ideally, one first defines a universe of humor items and then draws items from it randomly. Such a universe could be, for example, all jokes and cartoons in a culture available at a certain time. Not defining the entire universe, or not drawing randomly, will result in a biased sample and hence not a comprehensive model. Another issue determining the outcome is whether the answer format is unrestricted (e.g., a rating scale) or ipsative (e.g., a Q-sort, where every person has the same mean). This has been used in humor statements (to compensate for social desirability, as pointed out by Kenneth Craik, Martin Lampert, and Arvalea Nelson in 1996), or in ratings of jokes to avoid cases where people like everything or nothing, as Raymond Cattell and Lester Luborsky (1947) point out. Further considerations relate to the analysis: the relation of the components (independent of each other, orthogonal or interrelated, oblique), the hierarchy (general or multiple factors), and the arrangement (e.g., a circumplex).

A factor (e.g., of humor appreciation) will only emerge if at least two markers for the factor are included in the sampled items. Bloated specifics occur when a very narrow and unimportant aspect is oversampled; for example, when many variants of “coping with humor” enter formulations of items, a very potent factor will emerge that gives the appearance of being more important than it actually is. Another issue is that all variables should be roughly at the same level of abstraction; a global concept, such as appreciation of humor, should not be mixed with specific variables, for example liking of a comedian, a particular funny film, or a single punch line. Furthermore, the sample or participants should not be restricted in variance (or be too homogeneous); for instance, in a sample of successful comedians, low scores in humor will be missing altogether, which will lower the intercorrelations among scales and thus distort the factor structure.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading